Packers/Cardinals game in review


I took my son to his first Packer game Friday – and he loved it. Lambeau really gets the Packer fan experience right. The product on the field, however, was a different story. I wasn’t able to watch as analytically as I usually would but from what I did see, the Packers looked awful. There was very little positive going on. I wasn’t impressed by the running game, the passing game, the defense or even special teams. Here are some more specific thoughts:

  • I know it was the first mostly meaningless preseason game and I know Rodgers barely played. And I know he obviously makes a huge difference for any game. But I came away concerned by exactly that – without Rodgers, this team right now seems really weak. I think this will be one of those years where Rodgers will be forced to squeeze the talent out of everyone for the Packers to even make the playoffs. Ugh.
  • While Tyrone Walker showed some potential, with the loss of Jennings and Driver, our WR corps suddenly seems to lack depth. If Cobb, Nelson or Jones suffer an injury (or subpar play) this year, we could really end up being limited by our WR group.
  • The running game looks like it is in process. Neither Starks, Franklin or Green inspired much confidence. I expect this to be the case as McCarthy continues to try to develop a more threatening running game. I won’t rule out the possibility of some positive development here with Lacy and DuJuan Harris in the mix (and the potential for Franklin). We’ll see.
  • The defense could be a real problem this year. It hasn’t been that good now for a while as it is but now what I’m really worried about is leadership. I think letting Woodson go, while it may have made sense financially, will prove to be one of those quiet intangible losses – because he was a leader. I’m not sure who will step up to be a leader – but one key for becoming a leader is quality play. That’s why when Capers/MM talk about Hawk being a defensive leader I just don’t think it works out quite…because he’s just not good enough.
  • We seriously lack depth at LB. I think this will dog us all year especially in light of the fact that those starting (with the exception of Matthews) are average or below. Not good.
  • I think we may be seeing the end of the Graham Harrell era. I kind of liked him coming out of college but he still seems hesitant to me or something out there. I still am not sure how he didn’t see the rusher coming on the sack/fumble situation. Wasn’t a blind-side hit – I think he must have been locked onto a WR. I just get the sense that he’s overwhelmed by what’s going on out there and is still several beats away from playing with the instinct that probably got him to this level.
  • Vince Young didn’t do a whole lot out there but one thing he did seem to bring instantly was a sense of respect and command. And of course, the threat of running. The players playing with him looked at him differently than the players playing with Harrell. As I’ve said before, I would feel better with Young as the backup if Rodgers got hurt. I’d feel like there would at least be a chance the team could pull off a victory.
  • This Packer team felt very different to me. Again, I know it’s preseason but we’re missing some huge personalities and I feel a general personality void going on or something. While some personalities may not be “missed” (like Jennings…wow…), when guys like Driver and Woodson and even Bishop are gone, it just feels like there is a void now. While the lack of personalities may help the team fly under the radar a bit, I worry that it will more than anything, effectively dump the entire “leadership” burden onto Rodgers – who has plenty to do already.
  • I think this season could essentially end up being a rebuilding year – I thought this before the preseason game and now I believe this even more.

9 Responses to “Packers/Cardinals game in review”

  1. kozakmanKozak Says:

    Yeah, a rebuilding year. Another year of Rodgers at his peak wasted….

  2. Dave K Says:

    I am certainly not as pessimistic about this team. I think they will be better on offense and defense then a year ago. I’m just not sure they get enough better to get to another Superbowl.

    The offense will be fine and will score enough to win most games. How far this team goes will depend on how much this defense can improve. It would sure help if Jones and Perry become play makers. Those two guys and how much pressure they can get opposite Matthews will determine if this defense jumps into a top-10 unit or flutters about in mediocrity for another year. The secondary and MLB’s job become much easier if Perry/Jones create pressure along with Matthews.

    Harrell might be in jeopardy of not making the 53. Does anyone think he projects into a starting QB in this league? I sure don’t. At this point in his career he should be mopping up in preseason games and instead he looks unsure and make terrible decisions. If the team isn’t grooming the next starting QB then what they need is a guy that can finish a game or even start a game and get a victory. Young might be better equipped to do that then Harrell. Keep Young as your #2 to finish a game if needed and start over with a young prospect to groom as your #3 QB ala Matt Flynn. But, don’t waste time on Harrell who appears to be a guy who is never going to take the next step.

  3. Dave in Tucson Says:

    I’m not real worried about the passing offense (at least, not yet). As you say, Rodgers only played one series, and Nelson and Cobb were both off the field. Frankly, I think if Rodgers misses more than a game, the Packers are done no matter who they have for a backup QB.

    I agree the running offense didn’t look like much. I was kind of surprised Starks got so many carries. Maybe they’re looking to see how durable he is? It was also disappointing not to see Harris or Lacy out there. Hopefully those guys can bring a spark.

    I agree the defense, specifically the pass defense, looked awful. The Cardinals had nearly 10 yards per pass attempt, which is just not acceptable.

    I have to agree. If this game is any indication of how the season is going to go, it’s going to be another year of Rodgers dragging them to the playoffs, followed by an ugly loss to the first quality opponent they face.

  4. Dave in Tucson Says:

    Oops… meant to include this in the above post. One bright spot? It’s not all rainbows and unicorns over in Minnesota. That article talks about how D.Bishop might not even make the final 53 (thanks to yet another injury). So, there’s that.

  5. Dave K Says:

    Andy, how old is your son? My son is 9 and I was wondering if this would be a good year for a regular season game. We have done family night a few years. It’s about a 4 hour drive for us so I am not sure I want the drive and expense for a preseason game.

    • awhayes Says:

      Dave – sorry, I thought I responded to your post before. My son is 6 years old and a preseason game was perfect for his attention span etc. I ended up getting 2 seats at the 40 yard line, 30 rows up – perfect seats – for $29 each. (Used a website called eventsusa – a ticket broker out of Green Bay.) Great experience using them. I’m guessing the preseason game would be more similar to the Family Night experience than a regular season game. So depending on your son’s demeanor (i.e. if your son can sit still for the most part), I’d think he’d be ready for a regular season game.

  6. 56coop Says:

    Is this site abandoned?

Leave a Reply to mike5371d Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: