Archive for June, 2009

Favre had surgery

June 7, 2009

Interesting development in the Favre situation – he had surgery last month. He has tested his arm since and because it hasn’t felt 100%, he hasn’t signed with the Vikes yet.


Ok – maybe Bedard wasn’t reaching on Kampman

June 4, 2009

A few posts ago, I argued that Kampman’s silence probably wasn’t that big of a deal and that he maybe just wanted to learn more re the defense before saying much about it etc. I wrote in response to Greg Bedard’s article contending the Kampman silence was very odd and may have been due to his unhappiness with the new defense and/or possibly its potential effect on his contract negotiations.

Well, it’s not that I didn’t believe Greg – he wrote a compelling article. It’s more that I just thought that when Kampman did speak, he’d put our concerns at ease. Well, I’m not so sure he did. After reading this article by Jason Wilde of the WSJ, I am now leaning toward believing that Bedard/Wilde may be right – Kampman may really not like this defense. His response to a question about whether he likes the defense, according to Wilde, was: “I’m learning it.” There are so many better ways to answer this question without lying and fueling media hype about your possible unhappiness with the new defense. In fact, what seems to be missing in most of Kampman’s responses is the solid, balanced, optimism he usually offers the media. I usually trust Wilde (as I usually trust Bedard), and given that both of them have now expressed these same concerns and that both of them have an insider’s sense for the players, I can’t help but alter my take on this situation. Wilde mentioned on the radio the other day that at that time, part of the reason for Kampman’s silence could be due to the fact that he’s such a devout Christian and that he will not lie, so he just didn’t want to have to face the media because he knew he’d have trouble balancing no lying with being a team guy. At the time, I doubted Wilde’s take – now I’d say it seems probable.

I still believe that the hard work and attitude that got Kampman here will ultimately prevail and make him successful in the new defense. But I have to say, I find his shiftiness about all of this curious and regard it at this point, as a developing concern. It’s not that I don’t understand where he’s coming from – I would be frustrated if a major change came down at my workplace and it made me shift into a different role I had doubts about and that could very well affect my financial future. But what seems odd here is that Kampman seems to be going about this, as Wilde says, in a very “un-Kampman-like” fashion.

Jeremy Thompson, Kampman, OLB question

June 2, 2009

Rob Demovsky has an interesting article today re the possibility of Jeremy Thompson grabbing the starting strong side OLB spot. Quite compelling and it does seem as though the coaching staff has noticed his potential.

I am not too concerned about who ends up starting at either OLB spot (excluding Poppinga – he shouldn’t start period). I just want the best guys out there. I’ll go so far as to say I don’t think Kampman necessarily should be anointed the starting left OLB. While I like Kampman, have faith that he can learn the position and believe he’ll ultimately end up making the transition, if Thompson or Matthews or Bishop or anyone ends up coming in and performing better, I wouldn’t mind looking at potential trades for Kampman or moving him back to DL for certain packages. As cold as that sounds and as much as I do believe Kampman will make the transition, I think it may be smart to start thinking about options for the team should the 3-4 transition not take for Kampman.