<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for packergeeks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>All Things Green Bay Packers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 06:45:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Some stats to chew on by Dave In Tucson</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/11/24/some-stats-to-chew-on/#comment-8260</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave In Tucson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 06:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=4099#comment-8260</guid>
		<description>I was just looking at the Packers &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballoutsiders.com/dvoa-ratings/2009/week-11-dvoa-ratings&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Week 11 DVOA Ratings&lt;/a&gt;.

Offense: #4.  Defense: #1.  Special teams: #31.

Yikes.  That&#039;s one really bad problem.  (Oh, yeah--Special teams #32?  That would be the Steelers).

D&#8712;T</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just looking at the Packers <a href="http://www.footballoutsiders.com/dvoa-ratings/2009/week-11-dvoa-ratings" rel="nofollow">Week 11 DVOA Ratings</a>.</p>
<p>Offense: #4.  Defense: #1.  Special teams: #31.</p>
<p>Yikes.  That&#8217;s one really bad problem.  (Oh, yeah&#8211;Special teams #32?  That would be the Steelers).</p>
<p>D&isin;T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some stats to chew on by 56Coop</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/11/24/some-stats-to-chew-on/#comment-8258</link>
		<dc:creator>56Coop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=4099#comment-8258</guid>
		<description>Happy Thanksgiving Packergeeks. Be back on Friday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy Thanksgiving Packergeeks. Be back on Friday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some stats to chew on by 56Coop</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/11/24/some-stats-to-chew-on/#comment-8257</link>
		<dc:creator>56Coop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=4099#comment-8257</guid>
		<description>Having a terrible day here.  Thanks for the laugh joshy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having a terrible day here.  Thanks for the laugh joshy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some stats to chew on by joshywoshybigfatposhy</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/11/24/some-stats-to-chew-on/#comment-8256</link>
		<dc:creator>joshywoshybigfatposhy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=4099#comment-8256</guid>
		<description>great collection there.  i&#039;m absolutely flabbergasted that grant is the #9 back in the league average-wise right now.  does he have incentives in his contract?  think of what our running game could be if mccarthy called 25-30 running plays per game.  

here are two more stats i found:

- if brett favre wins an mvp and a superbowl, 38% of packer fans will end it all, 93% will vomit all over their new shoes, and 29% of favre-detractors will claim they supported him all the way, buy a #4 jersey, go out into the backyard with it and rub dirt on it so it looks at least 24 months old.

-if brett favre wins an mvp, throws 59 touchdowns, has a passer rating of 154.45, but contributes to his team&#039;s failure to achieve a superbowl win in ANY WAY - 85% of packer fans will be just fine with that.  if he outright loses a playoff game for his team, packer fans will (rightly) give new meaning to the word &#039;smug.&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great collection there.  i&#8217;m absolutely flabbergasted that grant is the #9 back in the league average-wise right now.  does he have incentives in his contract?  think of what our running game could be if mccarthy called 25-30 running plays per game.  </p>
<p>here are two more stats i found:</p>
<p>- if brett favre wins an mvp and a superbowl, 38% of packer fans will end it all, 93% will vomit all over their new shoes, and 29% of favre-detractors will claim they supported him all the way, buy a #4 jersey, go out into the backyard with it and rub dirt on it so it looks at least 24 months old.</p>
<p>-if brett favre wins an mvp, throws 59 touchdowns, has a passer rating of 154.45, but contributes to his team&#8217;s failure to achieve a superbowl win in ANY WAY &#8211; 85% of packer fans will be just fine with that.  if he outright loses a playoff game for his team, packer fans will (rightly) give new meaning to the word &#8217;smug.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Week 11 picks by awhayes</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/11/21/week-11-picks/#comment-8255</link>
		<dc:creator>awhayes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=4087#comment-8255</guid>
		<description>Ben - it&#039;s possible, quite possible. My judgment on things Vikings is...clouded. Probably pick Vikes this week only to watch Chicago pull a massive upset.

Kurmudge - terrible week. Just ruined my good standing in the spread pool I&#039;m in. terrible week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben &#8211; it&#8217;s possible, quite possible. My judgment on things Vikings is&#8230;clouded. Probably pick Vikes this week only to watch Chicago pull a massive upset.</p>
<p>Kurmudge &#8211; terrible week. Just ruined my good standing in the spread pool I&#8217;m in. terrible week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Week 11 picks by Kurmudge</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/11/21/week-11-picks/#comment-8254</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurmudge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=4087#comment-8254</guid>
		<description>Man, you missed on every upset or gamble!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, you missed on every upset or gamble!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some stats to chew on by Joe</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/11/24/some-stats-to-chew-on/#comment-8253</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=4099#comment-8253</guid>
		<description>&quot;The Packers have the #3 ranked defense in yards allowed per game, yet they are ranked 12th in points allowed per game.&quot;

easily explained:  the special teams unit gives the other team such a short field that they simply can&#039;t give up more yards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Packers have the #3 ranked defense in yards allowed per game, yet they are ranked 12th in points allowed per game.&#8221;</p>
<p>easily explained:  the special teams unit gives the other team such a short field that they simply can&#8217;t give up more yards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First half recap by Joe</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/11/22/first-half-recap-2/#comment-8252</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/11/22/first-half-recap-2/#comment-8252</guid>
		<description>Dang - Coop, thanks Coop.  I think I will stop now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dang &#8211; Coop, thanks Coop.  I think I will stop now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First half recap by Joe</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/11/22/first-half-recap-2/#comment-8251</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/11/22/first-half-recap-2/#comment-8251</guid>
		<description>Thanks Cap.  Its funny but the comments are up in a different order than they showed up on the moble display and I did not see my comment today when I came to the site.  Was it delayed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Cap.  Its funny but the comments are up in a different order than they showed up on the moble display and I did not see my comment today when I came to the site.  Was it delayed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First half recap by 56Coop</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/11/22/first-half-recap-2/#comment-8250</link>
		<dc:creator>56Coop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/11/22/first-half-recap-2/#comment-8250</guid>
		<description>Joe--if your post was aobut Kampman starting (can&#039;t see the game from the deer blind), scroll up.  It&#039;s the 2nd post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe&#8211;if your post was aobut Kampman starting (can&#8217;t see the game from the deer blind), scroll up.  It&#8217;s the 2nd post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>