Archive for the ‘football’ Category

Jermichael Finley’s name - theory

April 28, 2008

There were many more interesting names in the 2008 Draft. But I thought I might share my theory on how Finley was named Jermichael. (And I should add, a scenario I’m not unfamiliar with…)

Setting - hospital in Texas, March 26, 1987:

Mother talking to father moments after mother delivers. “What should we call him. We’re so indecisive. We’ve narrowed it down to two, I love Jeremy and and you love Michael. We have to decide. I also am not sure if I should have the lasagna or the chop suey”.

Mom: “Let’s go with Jeremy”.

Father, “No, should be Michael.”

Mom: “Jeremy”

Father: “Michael”.

Nurse: “um, we need a name”.

Mom: “Fine, how about Micheremy?”

Father, “No, but Jermichael would work”.

Jermichael.

Jokes aside - I’m excited to welcome Jermichael to the Packers. Exciting player.

“I Can Still Play, I Just Don’t Want To”

March 6, 2008

Brett Favre was emotional as he announced his retirement this afternoon. Greg Bedard has lots of details and there will be video/transcript over at Packers.com.

The first question he took involved an issue we’ve kicked around a bit here. Will he unretire?

He didn’t answer directly. If I had been watching a politician answering a question about whether he might seek higher office, the lede might be: He did not rule it out.

But Favre isn’t a politician. And watching as the press conference continued, I got the impression that Favre is very comfortable with his decision. Although he was quite emotional as the session began, he regained his composure the longer he spoke and gave very rational, thoughtful answers about his decision to retire.

“Believe me, I’ve questioned the decision. I think it’s the right decision.”

UPDATE: On ESPN News, Darren Woodson and Mark Schlereth had just the opposite view. They both argued that Favre seemed to leave the door open to a return quite deliberately, given that he refused to rule it out twice in response to questions. Interesting.

UPDATE: The PFT guys think he’s done for good. “Above all else it was clear it was final.” Their whole post is worth reading.

Some suspect Favre isn’t really done

March 4, 2008

Gotta admit, we’re thrilled that our website has generated lots of traffic today, but I’m heartbroken that it’s due largely to the retirement of my favorite athlete - ever (and he’s in good company - Sidney Moncrief, Fred Couples, Robin Yount, James Lofton). Most of the comments we have received today are largely positive with most folks appropriately recognizing that one of the game’s best is done. It’s really a sad day.However, I have read several comments that intrigue the desperate optimist in me - these comments reveal the suspicion that this may not be a permanent decision. I’ve already wondered that with every fiber of my being, but I just doubt it. I think he knows he’s sort of too big to go back on it now. And, one other quiet factor that may be at play is that it’s entirely possible that TT was intentionally NOT exhaustive in his encouragement of Brett to come back: maybe he really wants the Rodgers era to begin now. TT had a similar attitude last year if you recall.

I still doubt that Favre will reverse his decision but I guess we can never know. As training camp approaches and Favre has already mowed his estate for the 40th time this spring, perhaps he’ll get a hankering to make one more grand effort.

UPDATE: Count former Packer William Henderson as one of the skeptics re this decision. He just said on WTMJ (Milwaukee’s NBC affiliate) that players are known to retract statements. He essentially noted that it doesn’t add up that he would make this decision after his tremendous last year, but he did allow for the possibility that Favre has just had enough. Still, even the newscasters interpreted Henderson’s comments as him feeling like Favre may not have made his final decision. We can only hope - I heard Rodgers just got injured going to the fridge to grab a Pabst.

UPDATE #2: Count Troy Aikman and Jerome Bettis as two other insightful NFL guys who expressed some doubt that Favre will remain retired. Again, I’m not in the denial stage, but when quality NFL guys bring this up, I find myself slipping back to the denial stage.

More Favre links from jsonline.com

March 4, 2008

Check out these articles: Harris, Pickett weigh in - fans grieve at Lambeau.

Pickett: Life without Favre “kind of scary”
Al Harris says announcement came as a big surprise
Grieving fans migrate to Lambeau

Great grieving article actually. The best part, the name of the interviewee’s husband: Primus. Seriously, the article does get at why Packer fans will be more affected by this retirement perhaps than some non-Packer fans can understand. Supporting this is really a cross-generational thing. Brother Steve and I are not unique in that our grandpa was a huge fan and that he had season tickets back in the day. It is common for many Packer fans to be able to trace the roots of their Packer passion back 2 generations or more.

Grief support for the Favre pain

March 4, 2008

As a counselor, I feel like it’s my duty to share with you all the commonly referred to model for the stages of grief. Considering that Favre retiring is akin to the loss of a loved one for many of us, here it is:

D-Denial
A-Anger
B-Bargaining
D-Depression
A-Acceptance

According to the model’s founder, Elizabeth Kubler-Ross, each of us may go through the various stages at our own pace. While some of you may find this helpful knowledge to have given the news today, I’ll share with you my model:

S-Shock
D-Depression
P-Pabst

Rodgers comment from earlier…clarified…

March 4, 2008

Earlier, I made the comment that I worry Rodgers may be a whiner and that that is one area of contrast between he and Favre I’m not looking forward to watching. I stand by that comment as I do have that worry. However, I want to make it abundantly clear that I support Aaron Rodgers, believe he is talented and will be rooting hard for him to be a successful Packer. While I have concerns re his injury issues and wonder if he can physically handle the demands of the NFL quarterback position, I think he is talented and confident in what he’s doing. And, I also think we’ll all begin to admire his intense desire to win - he seems like a fiery competitor. And, while I’m at it, I also recognize that he may add a dimension to quarterbacking that perhaps Favre was missing in the latter stages of his career - gaining positive yards on the ground. (Now, this is not to be mistaken for Favre’s ability to escape pressure in the pocket - he may have been the best in NFL history at doing this. I’m referring here to actually running forward for yards).

Still, I’m saddened by this news because he was the most enjoyable NFL player to watch in my lifetime (with Barry Sanders a distant second and Walter Payton a distant third).

Update - Favre retires…

March 4, 2008

Apparently, jsonline.com might be crashing because I’m unable to navigate on there. One thing of note here (especially for those like me who are desparately hoping Jay Glazer accidentally ingested acid or something and made this up), Glazer does not give a source or even cite an anonymous source. He just states that Favre apparently told the organization a few days ago that he was going to call it quits. While this may not be meaningful, I will cling to it until it is confirmed.

Now, while I’ll stop short of saying I called this because I actually didn’t, both Steve and I had grown quite suspicious of this outcome recently as Favre was taking more time to decide than he had let on earlier. If this indeed is true, I’m going to be very upset. While I’m not a cry-er, if you will, a tear may be shed at some point here. He is the Packers. He is Wisconsin. And for a Wisconsin culture that tends to prefer little change, he was the picture of stability. Ouch.

Hate to look forward, but I want to say this as I’m thinking it right now. Packer fans have been spoiled by a quarterback who for years has had a wonderfully admirable attitude on and off the field - rarely berating fellow players and being a great leader by example. Aaron Rodgers may end up being decent, but I’m calling this right now - we may tire quickly of what could be a whining tendency.

Packergeeks season grades - Offense/Special Teams

January 31, 2008

Quarterback:
Favre - A. I considered A- for Favre due to his relatively bad games against the Giants/Bears/Dallas, but he really had a great season and I think it is significant that he had his career-high completion percentage this year - that means better quarterback thinking and better coaching.
Rodgers - B-. Many may wonder how he could not get an A for a top-notch relief effort against the Cowboys - his only real action of the season. He gets the B- for being unable to stay off the injury report. His delicate nature should be a powerful reminder to Packer and NFL fans that Favre’s record streak is one of the greatest records in all of sports. Sure, he had bye weeks at the right time and he may have played too hurt at some points in his career, but when you consider all the other QBs other teams have gone through and the fact that our own back-ups can barely make it through a game, it is impressive. And let me add, Brady and/or Manning may someday break the streak if they both keep it up, but neither of these guys get hit like Favre has - they would have to get an asterisk.
Nall - D+. Nall was really bad in his only opportunity. He was not with the team too long so that is an excuse, but still, he had the previous week of practice and laid an egg with his opportunity.

Running Backs/Full Backs:
Morency - C-. If I graded him based on my expectations going into the season, he would get an F. I thought he would be a big contributor with his shifty style and determination. Unless it changes next year, (if he even makes the team), I might have to admit to Brother Steve that this mancrush was a mistake.
Grant - A. Ryan Grant had an incredible season. He deserves an A, maybe an A+. He runs hard, he has an extra gear we’re all surprised to observe, and he has a great attitude. I disagree with those who think we shouldn’t be somewhat confident that he’s the long term answer - he will be. He will be able to build off of this year and become an even savvier (if you will?) runner going forward. I hate to admit it, but Brother Steve called this one big-time right when the trade happened.
Wynn - C+. Wynn kind of got hosed when he was put on IR mid-season. I know the decision to put him on IR was not just due to the injury he had at the time, but due instead to his history of being a wuss, but still - he could have come back in a few weeks. He did have some flashes and made some special plays this year. If he can be a little more pain-tolerant, I think he could end up being a contributor to this team.
Jackson - C. Poor guy - he had a chance to start for a big-time team and blew it. He was bad and rightfully was replaced as the starter. The end of the year, however, he showed that TT may not have been on something when he drafted him afterall. He looked darn good in some of the final games. I also loved his penalty against Seattle trying to block a punt - when was the last time any Packer coach went after a punter! It was a somewhat costly penalty, but I’d much rather take some chances here and there than play lame/conservative ball all the time.
Hall - B-. Did well for making transition from linebacker. Without game video, it’s so hard to really understand who is screwing up when a run play goes nowhere, but I can’t help but suspect several times, Hall wasn’t making the right block. On the other hand, he clearly, sometimes single-bodiedly (as it were) opened holes for Grant. Overall, I do think this guy has promise and think this year of experience will be a solid foundation for years of productivity.
Kuhn - C+. He stepped in and did a decent job when called upon and made some nice special teams plays. Don’t mind having him around.

Offensive Line:
Colledge - D+. Not sure if it was as much his fault as people make it out to be, but judging from what the coaches said throughout the season (including the refreshingly blunt Joe Philbin), he did not play well. Platooning with Coston may have disrupted his rhythm, though a solid argument could be that he never had rhythm.
Spitz - C+. I’d have to go back and check, but I think it was Spitz who filled in admirably at center when Wells was out. I don’t think he had a great year at guard, but he was a center in college, so we should probably expect some development time for him in this new position.
Wells - B-. Though some coaches really think highly of him, from my perspective, a good number of the run plays that didn’t go anywhere seemed to have defenders shooting through the middle area, where Wells is. Maybe it wasn’t always his man, but it made me wonder. Still, very solid young player.
Clifton - B. I’m surprised he is going to the Pro Bowl. He has had a few very strong years for the Packers and should have gone before, but I didn’t see this necessarily as a strong year. I’ve read articles from national writers saying he was one of the best in the league this year and I just don’t see it. As McGinn noted, he’s always been a good pass protector which is a critical skill needed in a left tackle with a right-handed quarterback (blindside guy). However, I just don’t think he moves that well on the run blocking. I think Tauscher is quite a bit better than Clifton overall.
Tauscher - A-. He may have had a few errors this year here and there, but overall, he was rock solid again. He should go to the Pro Bowl. His game against Kerney was one of the best games I’ve seen from an O-Lineman. He is very good on the run and more than adequate on pass plays. He is smart and level-headed (and a great guest on Tuesdays with Tauscher on the new 540 ESPN Radio Milwaukee).
Coston - C+. He apparently showed some flashes when he did play, but I didn’t watch him that carefully frankly. There must be a reason they keep him on the roster though.

Receivers/Tight Ends:
Driver - A. He is a true professional. He gracefully stood by as more and more national attention was going to Jennings (and even acknowledged at one point that he thought Jennings should be the one going to the Pro Bowl). I think he genuinely takes guys like Jennings under his wing and provides valuable insight. Jennings and the other receivers are really lucky to have Driver on the team. All class.
Jennings - A. Brother Steve has a huge mancrush on Jennings, sometimes scary. He has said from day one that Jennings just has it - just like what Favre said. He does. He has a way of managing his body that seems so fluid, making moves that usually only talented veterans make. The only issue I had with Jennings this year were a couple times on interceptions where he didn’t seem to very aggressively try to disrupt the D-back or prevent the pick.
Jones - B-. I really like James Jones and am trying hard to assess him bias-free. I think he has huge potential and is already quite good. But the truth is, he had rookie moments. It is surprising to me that he led the team in drops considering he has great hands, but he did have some important drops. His fumbles against Chicago also hurt. But these are learning experiences and I expect him to be even better next year.
Martin - B+. When he’s in the game, I don’t know if there is anyone more active than Ruvell Martin. If he is not running a route, he is making tight-end quality blocks. He plays hard and outside of a pretty crucial drop in the Giants game, he had a great year.
Bodiford - C-. He’s another player who had a few opportunities this year that he didn’t seem to take advantage of. Like a few others though, there must be a reason he keeps being asked to come back
Robinson - C+. He had a couple nice kick returns and was an important emotional spark for the team at a time when lots of teams start to mentally/emotionally fatigue. However, he clearly has lost speed and his moves do not appear to be very fluid/evasive. I wouldn’t mind if he sticks around though because he could end up becoming one of those savvy veteran receivers that make contributions somehow whenever called upon.

Special Teams:
Coverage Units - B-. Solid overall effort. Few (if any?) runbacks allowed and overall held opponents to average field position.
Return Units - B-. There were a few spectacular plays by Williams, Blackmon, Woodson and one by Robinson. Overall the efforts were solid. But championship teams can usually get a bit more out of the return game to make it a solid X factor in games. Hopefully this will happen next year.
Jon Ryan - B-. Wacky year. Some horrendous plays and at least 2 unreal plays (monster punt in the Detroit game after the bad Bears game and the improv panic run for a first down - up there for play of the year). Still, stats-wise he did reasonably well and he seems to be growing nicely into his potential.
Mason Crosby - B. Very solid rookie year. One hallmark of great teams is that the GMs aren’t afraid to make what seem like questionable personnel moves if they really believe an upgrade is possible. I don’t know of anyone who complained about Dave Raynor after last year so we all assumed finding a kicker was not a priority. TT must have thought differently and seen something in Crosby. He’s tough, he has a good leg, he’s reasonably accurate, he held his own as a rookie and, like this whole roster it seems, he has a great attitude.

Stay tuned for coaching grades.

Still hungover from the Packer loss?

January 23, 2008

Snap out of it - take some Aleve! The offseason soap opera of wild speculation coupled with soaring anticipation is upon us and Packergeeks hopes to fuel it.

After a loss like Sunday, I have to admit it is hard for me to get my mind around the fact that we need to start thinking already about which players may be lost to free agency/which players we should draft. But we might as well start. Tom Silverstein did this morning in an article at jsonline.com. Here’s a quick look at the 6 players mentioned in the article and Packergeeks’ thoughts:

*Corey Williams - he was a legit starter most of the year and fairly productive. While he’s good and valued, I don’t think he would be impossible to replace. One sad part about not re-signing him though, is that he loves Green Bay. I do remember after the game on Sunday watching as the camera showed him kneeling at mid-field seemingly absorbing the moment. After the Seattle game, when he came off the field, he raised his arms in the air, paused for a solid few seconds and again, almost absorbed the moment.
*Rob Davis - if he retires, we probably wouldn’t miss him tremendously on the field (though he has been good at his job for years), but he would be missed dearly in the locker room if he retired and left the organization. However, indications are at this point (not just from Silverstein, but elsewhere too), that he’ll stay on with the team in some capacity. This would be important especially considering that a few weeks ago the team pretty much agreed that he’s the locker room leader.
*Frank Walker - I’m not sure what to make of his performance. I don’t remember any poor games or any outstanding games. This indicates to me that he may not have been given much of a chance (as he indicates in the article). Frankly, pun intended, I think it was dumb to not have him active for the Giants game - whenever a player faces an old team, you HAVE to play the guy. That was not smart. Anyway, he may have been more of a special teams acquisition from the start and he probably could be replaced easily.
*Tracy White - he should be a major priority signing in the offseason. He is outstanding on special teams and sometimes I wonder if he could outplay Poppinga as a starter.
*Ryan Krause - I don’t know much re this guy except that at one point, he openly admitted he’s not good at, nor does he like blocking. Sounds like he may have worked on that this year. Unless we drop Franks and need another body, I’m not sure Krause needs to be a priority - Tory Humphrey had a good camp last year and was said to be an up-and-comer (I feel like an 80 year-old using an expression like that).
*Craig Nall - I doubt he’ll want to settle back into his 3rd string role (assuming Favre’s return), so it’s likely he’ll pursue free agency. However, if Favre does return, I think it would be nice for Favre to have him around - they apparently get along well. And, if I were Nall, it would be a no brainer to stay in Green Bay - making probably $700,000 to sit around, throw a ball here and there, play lots of golf, have ready access to the best fishing and hunting in the country, and be part of a 2008 Super Bowl team. Now, if Favre does retire, I would think Nall would want to stay if his goal is to actually play because Rodgers will probably last 14 seconds into his first game before another Paul Molitor-type injury.

Brett, You Got It Goin’ On

January 22, 2008

After reading the lunacy below from Mr. Packernet and some similar posts on the JS Online blog, I thought Brett Favre could use a little pick-me-up.  I’ve posted this once before but it really has more meaning after such a stinging defeat.

“I think sometimes you hear what you want to hear.”