<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Starks done for the year?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2012/12/05/starks-done-for-the-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2012/12/05/starks-done-for-the-year/</link>
	<description>All Things Green Bay Packers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 23:13:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 56coop</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2012/12/05/starks-done-for-the-year/#comment-24342</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[56coop]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 22:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=9321#comment-24342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sirius/XM reporting Starks&#039; is out 1-2 weeks.  Of course they thought Benson would rerturn too.  At this point I&#039;d say Grant can&#039;t hurt]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sirius/XM reporting Starks&#8217; is out 1-2 weeks.  Of course they thought Benson would rerturn too.  At this point I&#8217;d say Grant can&#8217;t hurt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave in Tucson</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2012/12/05/starks-done-for-the-year/#comment-24338</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave in Tucson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 16:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=9321#comment-24338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PFT now reporting &lt;a href=&#039;http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/05/packers-bringing-back-ryan-grant/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Packers are bringing back Ryan Grant&lt;/a&gt;.

Which I think is good... he was a decent change of pace for Starks last year, and he always seems to run well against the Bears.  The only catch I see here is 1) why did GB let him go in the first place, and 2) why (except for a brief stint w/the Redskins) has he been out of football this whole season?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PFT now reporting <a href='http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/05/packers-bringing-back-ryan-grant/' rel="nofollow">Packers are bringing back Ryan Grant</a>.</p>
<p>Which I think is good&#8230; he was a decent change of pace for Starks last year, and he always seems to run well against the Bears.  The only catch I see here is 1) why did GB let him go in the first place, and 2) why (except for a brief stint w/the Redskins) has he been out of football this whole season?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
