<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nick Perry &#8211; could be a quality pick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2012/04/26/nick-perry-could-be-a-quality-pick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2012/04/26/nick-perry-could-be-a-quality-pick/</link>
	<description>All Things Green Bay Packers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 18:57:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RayMidge</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2012/04/26/nick-perry-could-be-a-quality-pick/#comment-20796</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RayMidge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=8645#comment-20796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In TT We Trust!!

I can&#039;t pretend to know if this is a good pick or not, but I am glad that the pass rush is a focus and I am really hoping the Pack brings in more defensive players. There is not a position on defense that couldn&#039;t use at least some depth.  CB or S with round 2 and 3, I hope.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In TT We Trust!!</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t pretend to know if this is a good pick or not, but I am glad that the pass rush is a focus and I am really hoping the Pack brings in more defensive players. There is not a position on defense that couldn&#8217;t use at least some depth.  CB or S with round 2 and 3, I hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave K</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2012/04/26/nick-perry-could-be-a-quality-pick/#comment-20792</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave K]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 04:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=8645#comment-20792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perry has to add more production to ROLB then last year. Big upgrade at that spot but that isn&#039;t saying much. 

A lot of first round projections still on the board after day one. Worthy, Kontz, Upshaw.  Geez, if he could find a way to go up and get Worthy then they would really have a revamped pass rush.  

Clay, Raji, Pickett, Worthy, Perry. Yeah, that would solve some pass rush problems on defense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perry has to add more production to ROLB then last year. Big upgrade at that spot but that isn&#8217;t saying much. </p>
<p>A lot of first round projections still on the board after day one. Worthy, Kontz, Upshaw.  Geez, if he could find a way to go up and get Worthy then they would really have a revamped pass rush.  </p>
<p>Clay, Raji, Pickett, Worthy, Perry. Yeah, that would solve some pass rush problems on defense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
