<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bishop/Hawk out Sunday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/12/02/bishophawk-out-sunday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/12/02/bishophawk-out-sunday/</link>
	<description>All Things Green Bay Packers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 08:09:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave in Tucson</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/12/02/bishophawk-out-sunday/#comment-18150</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave in Tucson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 19:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=8227#comment-18150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just went back and looked.  It was definitely D.J. Smith.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just went back and looked.  It was definitely D.J. Smith.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusty</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/12/02/bishophawk-out-sunday/#comment-18107</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rusty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 00:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=8227#comment-18107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Might be wrong, but I think it was Ryan Taylor who messed up the onside kick. 

Communication will probably be the biggest concern. Two new guys carry the headsets. Neither Bishop or Hawk are all that athletic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Might be wrong, but I think it was Ryan Taylor who messed up the onside kick. </p>
<p>Communication will probably be the biggest concern. Two new guys carry the headsets. Neither Bishop or Hawk are all that athletic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave K</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/12/02/bishophawk-out-sunday/#comment-18105</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave K]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 00:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=8227#comment-18105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Next Man Up gave us Bishop last year and made Barnett&#039;s big cap number expendable. I&#039;m guessing Hawk might have the same worry. 

I think that MLB is the least important position on a true 3-4 defense. Yeah, you need assignment sure players that can tackle but you sure can cope with mediocre at that spot if needed more so then other positions. It&#039;ll be fun to see what these younger guys can do. 

Losing this game @ the Giants just might not be the end of the world. The team is banged up a bit and losing would take away all that perfect season pressure and may refocus this team on what really matters.  Plus, it taps the brakes on a Bear&#039;s wildcard run.  I&#039;m sure I&#039;ll be screaming at the TV if the Packers lay an egg but come Monday I don&#039;t think it matters much....except to the Bears.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next Man Up gave us Bishop last year and made Barnett&#8217;s big cap number expendable. I&#8217;m guessing Hawk might have the same worry. </p>
<p>I think that MLB is the least important position on a true 3-4 defense. Yeah, you need assignment sure players that can tackle but you sure can cope with mediocre at that spot if needed more so then other positions. It&#8217;ll be fun to see what these younger guys can do. </p>
<p>Losing this game @ the Giants just might not be the end of the world. The team is banged up a bit and losing would take away all that perfect season pressure and may refocus this team on what really matters.  Plus, it taps the brakes on a Bear&#8217;s wildcard run.  I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ll be screaming at the TV if the Packers lay an egg but come Monday I don&#8217;t think it matters much&#8230;.except to the Bears.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave in Tucson</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/12/02/bishophawk-out-sunday/#comment-18024</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave in Tucson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 02:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=8227#comment-18024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wasn&#039;t D.J. Smith the guy that dove for the onside kick during the TB game, in spite of the fact it clearly wasn&#039;t going 10 yards?

A big-time rookie mistake, even if it (just barely) didn&#039;t cost the Packers a possession.  Hopefully his lack of experience won&#039;t be an issue Sunday.

@Schaefer, you talking about Jason Pierre-Paul?  Yeah, he&#039;s definitely been one of the bright spots for the Giants this season, and somebody we&#039;re going to have to watch out for.

D&#8712;T]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t D.J. Smith the guy that dove for the onside kick during the TB game, in spite of the fact it clearly wasn&#8217;t going 10 yards?</p>
<p>A big-time rookie mistake, even if it (just barely) didn&#8217;t cost the Packers a possession.  Hopefully his lack of experience won&#8217;t be an issue Sunday.</p>
<p>@Schaefer, you talking about Jason Pierre-Paul?  Yeah, he&#8217;s definitely been one of the bright spots for the Giants this season, and somebody we&#8217;re going to have to watch out for.</p>
<p>D&isin;T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott L</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/12/02/bishophawk-out-sunday/#comment-18023</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott L]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 02:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=8227#comment-18023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew have you noticed the interest in the team rachet up a notch since thanksgiving?  Espn has had a packer section on their crawl all week.  Get to 12-0 vs the G men and it will start to get crazy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew have you noticed the interest in the team rachet up a notch since thanksgiving?  Espn has had a packer section on their crawl all week.  Get to 12-0 vs the G men and it will start to get crazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schaefer</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/12/02/bishophawk-out-sunday/#comment-17976</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schaefer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 22:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=8227#comment-17976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Love your enthusiasm...however NY is a veteran team and will likely expose us over the middle more than a few times.

I agree though that the loss of Hawk is not something to really worry about.  The Frenchy will more than make up for his loss.  Bishop&#039;s toughness is harder to replace...

Go Pack!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love your enthusiasm&#8230;however NY is a veteran team and will likely expose us over the middle more than a few times.</p>
<p>I agree though that the loss of Hawk is not something to really worry about.  The Frenchy will more than make up for his loss.  Bishop&#8217;s toughness is harder to replace&#8230;</p>
<p>Go Pack!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
