<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pretty boring game</title>
	<atom:link href="http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/10/16/pretty-boring-game/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/10/16/pretty-boring-game/</link>
	<description>All Things Green Bay Packers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 08:09:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: awhayes</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/10/16/pretty-boring-game/#comment-15455</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[awhayes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 14:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=8029#comment-15455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[there were definitely some blitzes in the game. but not a ton (as far as I could tell). Our D was odd - it seemed full of holes for much of the game as Bradford and co were advancing the ball at times, at will. But keep in mind Josh McDaniels is the O Coordinator and while he didn&#039;t make a good head coach, he can really get offenses moving the ball. And Bradford is good - if he had better WRs, I think that offense could pretty quickly become a top 7-8 offense. But still - the D didn&#039;t look great. On the other hand, the D looked fantastic keeping the Rams out of the end zone. Just like we did the last 3 quarters in Atlanta. And that, after all, is the ultimate job of the defense, no?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there were definitely some blitzes in the game. but not a ton (as far as I could tell). Our D was odd &#8211; it seemed full of holes for much of the game as Bradford and co were advancing the ball at times, at will. But keep in mind Josh McDaniels is the O Coordinator and while he didn&#8217;t make a good head coach, he can really get offenses moving the ball. And Bradford is good &#8211; if he had better WRs, I think that offense could pretty quickly become a top 7-8 offense. But still &#8211; the D didn&#8217;t look great. On the other hand, the D looked fantastic keeping the Rams out of the end zone. Just like we did the last 3 quarters in Atlanta. And that, after all, is the ultimate job of the defense, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ronlc1</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/10/16/pretty-boring-game/#comment-15454</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ronlc1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 14:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=8029#comment-15454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More than normal Rusty.  One thing I noticed a number of times was that on contact with a blocker they seemed to engage and hold their position.  I&#039;m unsure if that is by design or our guys just can&#039;t deal one on one with blockers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than normal Rusty.  One thing I noticed a number of times was that on contact with a blocker they seemed to engage and hold their position.  I&#8217;m unsure if that is by design or our guys just can&#8217;t deal one on one with blockers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusty</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/10/16/pretty-boring-game/#comment-15439</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rusty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 21:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=8029#comment-15439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I did not have the oppurtunity to catch this game in my area. Did Capers send many blitzes? It make sense for him to play it vanilla against a sub-par opponent. If you just focus on the yards this looks ugly. Not sure what to make of the win...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did not have the oppurtunity to catch this game in my area. Did Capers send many blitzes? It make sense for him to play it vanilla against a sub-par opponent. If you just focus on the yards this looks ugly. Not sure what to make of the win&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ronlc1</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/10/16/pretty-boring-game/#comment-15438</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ronlc1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 21:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=8029#comment-15438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I heard it was Schartz because Habaugh disrespected him with a fist bump instead of saking his hand.  I guess that&#039;s what happens when you&#039;ve been in a &quot;lefty&quot; west coast shool environment for so long.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard it was Schartz because Habaugh disrespected him with a fist bump instead of saking his hand.  I guess that&#8217;s what happens when you&#8217;ve been in a &#8220;lefty&#8221; west coast shool environment for so long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ronlc1</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/10/16/pretty-boring-game/#comment-15437</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ronlc1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 20:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=8029#comment-15437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did anyone see the end of the Detroit game?  The last shot I saw it looked like someone was going after Harbaugh going of ht e field.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did anyone see the end of the Detroit game?  The last shot I saw it looked like someone was going after Harbaugh going of ht e field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave in Tucson</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/10/16/pretty-boring-game/#comment-15434</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave in Tucson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 20:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=8029#comment-15434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not a big fan of basically coasting through the whole second half, even if the Packers did have a 3-score lead.  Would&#039;ve been nice to see a long, clock killing drive in the 3rd or 4th quarter end in a score, even if it was just a FG.

As for the defense--I&#039;m not too concerned about giving up 400 yards when the result is just 3 points.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a big fan of basically coasting through the whole second half, even if the Packers did have a 3-score lead.  Would&#8217;ve been nice to see a long, clock killing drive in the 3rd or 4th quarter end in a score, even if it was just a FG.</p>
<p>As for the defense&#8211;I&#8217;m not too concerned about giving up 400 yards when the result is just 3 points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ronlc1</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/10/16/pretty-boring-game/#comment-15433</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ronlc1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 20:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=8029#comment-15433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was a damn good thing that St L stinks.  The D was poor.  Scoring was held down more by the Rams incompetence than the Packer performance.  Over 400 yards for the 31st ranked offensive team.

Capers you still have a lot of work to do.  No real rush most of the day. Bad&#039; no horrible tackling again.

Slocum - Punt coverage

Bennet - you need to get a fresh jug of &quot;stickem.&quot;

MM play calling in the 2nd was boring, if not awful in the second half.

Don&#039;t think Rivers will miss the opportunity that Bradford did.  Need to keep up the intensity at practice through the bye week.  Usually MM comes out strong with a plan after the bye.  Be nice to have that available for the SD trip.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a damn good thing that St L stinks.  The D was poor.  Scoring was held down more by the Rams incompetence than the Packer performance.  Over 400 yards for the 31st ranked offensive team.</p>
<p>Capers you still have a lot of work to do.  No real rush most of the day. Bad&#8217; no horrible tackling again.</p>
<p>Slocum &#8211; Punt coverage</p>
<p>Bennet &#8211; you need to get a fresh jug of &#8220;stickem.&#8221;</p>
<p>MM play calling in the 2nd was boring, if not awful in the second half.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t think Rivers will miss the opportunity that Bradford did.  Need to keep up the intensity at practice through the bye week.  Usually MM comes out strong with a plan after the bye.  Be nice to have that available for the SD trip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
