<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Packers should bring in Steve Slaton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/09/27/packers-should-bring-in-steve-slaton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/09/27/packers-should-bring-in-steve-slaton/</link>
	<description>All Things Green Bay Packers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:11:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schaefer</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/09/27/packers-should-bring-in-steve-slaton/#comment-14610</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schaefer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 03:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=7914#comment-14610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the consensus is that you are crazy...and I must admit, I concur with consensus on this one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the consensus is that you are crazy&#8230;and I must admit, I concur with consensus on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/09/27/packers-should-bring-in-steve-slaton/#comment-14609</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Travis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 03:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=7914#comment-14609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently Tony Moll was in for a tryout. Could definitely see someone come in on the O line this week.

On a side note, before the season started I had hoped at some point during the season TT finds a way to lock up Finley or Nelson. These two are very valuable, and losing them would be a blow. I think with Jennings, Nelson and Finley, you will almost always have a mismatch to exploit. 

Finley has everything from size, to quickness, to hands, to extremely athletic. You don&#039;t see Tight ends like this come around too often. Keeping him would be valuable, despite the cost it would be. Hopefully TT starts working on it and we can get something reasonable done during the season.

The same for Nelson. He has really fit into the #2 wideout, and has done a great job. I like how he runs his routes, and he makes plays after the catch. 

I really think TT is going to make sure he can keep them both. It&#039;s just going to be too hard to let them walk. And I think both do enjoy it here which should help get a deal done. 

And we do have the cap to do it, considering we should have over 10 million to use this year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently Tony Moll was in for a tryout. Could definitely see someone come in on the O line this week.</p>
<p>On a side note, before the season started I had hoped at some point during the season TT finds a way to lock up Finley or Nelson. These two are very valuable, and losing them would be a blow. I think with Jennings, Nelson and Finley, you will almost always have a mismatch to exploit. </p>
<p>Finley has everything from size, to quickness, to hands, to extremely athletic. You don&#8217;t see Tight ends like this come around too often. Keeping him would be valuable, despite the cost it would be. Hopefully TT starts working on it and we can get something reasonable done during the season.</p>
<p>The same for Nelson. He has really fit into the #2 wideout, and has done a great job. I like how he runs his routes, and he makes plays after the catch. </p>
<p>I really think TT is going to make sure he can keep them both. It&#8217;s just going to be too hard to let them walk. And I think both do enjoy it here which should help get a deal done. </p>
<p>And we do have the cap to do it, considering we should have over 10 million to use this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveK</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/09/27/packers-should-bring-in-steve-slaton/#comment-14605</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DaveK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=7914#comment-14605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dolphins cut a 3-4 DE to make room for Slaton. (3rd year player Ryan Baker - 6&#039;5&quot; 295 pounds) Wonder if TT has any interest in him. I think he tried out another DE earlier in the week.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dolphins cut a 3-4 DE to make room for Slaton. (3rd year player Ryan Baker &#8211; 6&#8217;5&#8243; 295 pounds) Wonder if TT has any interest in him. I think he tried out another DE earlier in the week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/09/27/packers-should-bring-in-steve-slaton/#comment-14603</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 23:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=7914#comment-14603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why is he a head coach too?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is he a head coach too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon in DC</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/09/27/packers-should-bring-in-steve-slaton/#comment-14600</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon in DC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 21:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=7914#comment-14600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Dolphins just claimed Slaton off waivers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Dolphins just claimed Slaton off waivers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ronlc1</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/09/27/packers-should-bring-in-steve-slaton/#comment-14587</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ronlc1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=7914#comment-14587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joe following your thought process - if he can backup at RT and LT bring him in.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe following your thought process &#8211; if he can backup at RT and LT bring him in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/09/27/packers-should-bring-in-steve-slaton/#comment-14586</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=7914#comment-14586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unless he can play D-line, safety or middle linebacker this is idea is just silly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless he can play D-line, safety or middle linebacker this is idea is just silly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon in DC</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/09/27/packers-should-bring-in-steve-slaton/#comment-14584</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon in DC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=7914#comment-14584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why not bring in Terrell Owens and Randy Moss while you&#039;re at it ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not bring in Terrell Owens and Randy Moss while you&#8217;re at it &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave in Tucson</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/09/27/packers-should-bring-in-steve-slaton/#comment-14572</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave in Tucson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 07:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=7914#comment-14572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You pretty much answered your own question:

* We really don&#039;t need any more receivers.  Jennings, Nelson, and Finley are already on pace to have at or near 1,000 yard season.  And Cobb, Jones and Driver (or one of the non-Finley TEs) to take up the slack as needed.

* We really don&#039;t need any more running backs.  We&#039;ve already got Starks, Grant, and Kuhn competing for touches, with Green waiting in the wings.

* Slaton has really only had the one good season.  It&#039;s hard to believe, if he does have some quality football left, he&#039;s been denied just because Kubiak is a cranky old man (even if his coccyx is bothering him).

* We really do need to use roster spots to address injuries.  Nick Collins, as you mentioned, and Bulaga, if his injury turns out to be more serious or lingering than has been so far reported.

* Don&#039;t forget this is a team that made a lot of that Super Bowl run with &lt;em&gt;Brandon Jackson&lt;/em&gt; as the primary RB.  Granted, that wasn&#039;t pretty.  But I think the RB roster we have now just isn&#039;t the best place to look for upgrades.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You pretty much answered your own question:</p>
<p>* We really don&#8217;t need any more receivers.  Jennings, Nelson, and Finley are already on pace to have at or near 1,000 yard season.  And Cobb, Jones and Driver (or one of the non-Finley TEs) to take up the slack as needed.</p>
<p>* We really don&#8217;t need any more running backs.  We&#8217;ve already got Starks, Grant, and Kuhn competing for touches, with Green waiting in the wings.</p>
<p>* Slaton has really only had the one good season.  It&#8217;s hard to believe, if he does have some quality football left, he&#8217;s been denied just because Kubiak is a cranky old man (even if his coccyx is bothering him).</p>
<p>* We really do need to use roster spots to address injuries.  Nick Collins, as you mentioned, and Bulaga, if his injury turns out to be more serious or lingering than has been so far reported.</p>
<p>* Don&#8217;t forget this is a team that made a lot of that Super Bowl run with <em>Brandon Jackson</em> as the primary RB.  Granted, that wasn&#8217;t pretty.  But I think the RB roster we have now just isn&#8217;t the best place to look for upgrades.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveK</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/09/27/packers-should-bring-in-steve-slaton/#comment-14564</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DaveK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 02:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=7914#comment-14564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is up with Green?  Hasn&#039;t been active yet.  Injury?  Or, are they just keeping three rb&#039;s active on game day? (Grant, Starks, Kuhn). Hard to see how Slaton fits on the game day roster with our current backfield?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is up with Green?  Hasn&#8217;t been active yet.  Injury?  Or, are they just keeping three rb&#8217;s active on game day? (Grant, Starks, Kuhn). Hard to see how Slaton fits on the game day roster with our current backfield?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
