<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Packers/Saints Preview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/09/08/packerssaints-preview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/09/08/packerssaints-preview/</link>
	<description>All Things Green Bay Packers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 08:09:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: awhayes</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/09/08/packerssaints-preview/#comment-13925</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[awhayes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 22:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=7595#comment-13925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[nice keefer nice.

AZ - I too think Starks could do some serious damage out of the backfield as a receiver. The way he runs he strikes me as a guy secondary-types probably aren&#039;t too excited to tackle when he has some speed worked up. 

And Ron - I do share you concerns re the O-Line. The O-Line in the preseason was definitely questionable and tonight they&#039;ll face defensive intensity 10x greater than the preseason. Still, I&#039;ll hold onto my hope that Lang will quickly make us forget about Colledge and the rest of the guys start clicking as soon as the first quarter. We&#039;ll see.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice keefer nice.</p>
<p>AZ &#8211; I too think Starks could do some serious damage out of the backfield as a receiver. The way he runs he strikes me as a guy secondary-types probably aren&#8217;t too excited to tackle when he has some speed worked up. </p>
<p>And Ron &#8211; I do share you concerns re the O-Line. The O-Line in the preseason was definitely questionable and tonight they&#8217;ll face defensive intensity 10x greater than the preseason. Still, I&#8217;ll hold onto my hope that Lang will quickly make us forget about Colledge and the rest of the guys start clicking as soon as the first quarter. We&#8217;ll see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ronlc1</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/09/08/packerssaints-preview/#comment-13924</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ronlc1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 21:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=7595#comment-13924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Oline is not prepared to play tonight.  The pre-season rotation/eveluation was a negative.  A very big negative.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Oline is not prepared to play tonight.  The pre-season rotation/eveluation was a negative.  A very big negative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AZWarrior</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/09/08/packerssaints-preview/#comment-13922</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AZWarrior]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 21:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=7595#comment-13922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think Starks out of the backfield can be an awesome weapon.  Its been overlooked, I believe, how good a receiver he was in college and how good he&#039;s looked as a Packer when he had the opportunity to catch out of the b/f.

Go Pack!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Starks out of the backfield can be an awesome weapon.  Its been overlooked, I believe, how good a receiver he was in college and how good he&#8217;s looked as a Packer when he had the opportunity to catch out of the b/f.</p>
<p>Go Pack!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 56Coop</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/09/08/packerssaints-preview/#comment-13918</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[56Coop]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 20:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=7595#comment-13918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hope you are right.  This game scares me]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hope you are right.  This game scares me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keefer</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/09/08/packerssaints-preview/#comment-13913</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keefer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 16:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=7595#comment-13913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: Cobb....what makes you think there will be any punts to field? ;-).  52 - 49 Pack (ok not really)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Cobb&#8230;.what makes you think there will be any punts to field? <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .  52 &#8211; 49 Pack (ok not really)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
