<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2011 NFC West</title>
	<atom:link href="http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/09/07/2011-nfc-west/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/09/07/2011-nfc-west/</link>
	<description>All Things Green Bay Packers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 23:13:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave in Tucson</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/09/07/2011-nfc-west/#comment-13905</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave in Tucson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 17:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=7577#comment-13905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My general impression is that you&#039;ve got three of these teams winning too many games.

--AZ: they do look a lot better with Kolb at quarterback, and I think they&#039;ll be good for 8 or 9 wins this year.  But I don&#039;t see them sweeping the division, and I don&#039;t really see 6 wins outside the division.

--STL: I agree that with Bradford now having a year&#039;s experience, the Rams could easily take the NFCW.  They should make it to at least 8 wins, and the Cardinals will be the only team that could keep them from being division champs.

--SF: with a whole new coaching staff, and Alex Smith &lt;b&gt;still&lt;/b&gt; at starting QB, 7 wins seems like a lot for these guys.  They&#039;ve also been terrible on the road: since 2002, they&#039;ve won 4(!) road games outside the division.

--SEA: if the Seahawks make it anywhere near 7 wins, it will be because they bench TJax, and Charlie Whitehurst has a breakout year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My general impression is that you&#8217;ve got three of these teams winning too many games.</p>
<p>&#8211;AZ: they do look a lot better with Kolb at quarterback, and I think they&#8217;ll be good for 8 or 9 wins this year.  But I don&#8217;t see them sweeping the division, and I don&#8217;t really see 6 wins outside the division.</p>
<p>&#8211;STL: I agree that with Bradford now having a year&#8217;s experience, the Rams could easily take the NFCW.  They should make it to at least 8 wins, and the Cardinals will be the only team that could keep them from being division champs.</p>
<p>&#8211;SF: with a whole new coaching staff, and Alex Smith <b>still</b> at starting QB, 7 wins seems like a lot for these guys.  They&#8217;ve also been terrible on the road: since 2002, they&#8217;ve won 4(!) road games outside the division.</p>
<p>&#8211;SEA: if the Seahawks make it anywhere near 7 wins, it will be because they bench TJax, and Charlie Whitehurst has a breakout year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
