<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Woodson, Packers ready for a &#8220;run&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/08/03/woodson-packers-ready-for-a-run/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/08/03/woodson-packers-ready-for-a-run/</link>
	<description>All Things Green Bay Packers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 23:13:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave in Tucson</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/08/03/woodson-packers-ready-for-a-run/#comment-13688</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave in Tucson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 05:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=7492#comment-13688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple exciting comments on Starks from GB Press Gazette&#039;s live coverage of Friday night&#039;s practice:

* &lt;em&gt;Starks just ripped through a hole in a short yardage drill. One of those 3rd and 1 runs that sometimes goes for like 40 yards&lt;/em&gt;

* &lt;em&gt;MM: Starks is as explosive as he was in playoffs. Think he looks more powerful than last year. Has had excellent camp.&lt;/em&gt;

(that last one presumably a report from McCarthey&#039;s after-practice presser)

This could be really good--if the Packers have Grant and Starks as a one-two punch for the running game, and Rodgers passing to that receiving corps... wow.  I&#039;m trying to maintain a reasonable level of expectations here, but this could be a really good season.

D&#8712;T]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple exciting comments on Starks from GB Press Gazette&#8217;s live coverage of Friday night&#8217;s practice:</p>
<p>* <em>Starks just ripped through a hole in a short yardage drill. One of those 3rd and 1 runs that sometimes goes for like 40 yards</em></p>
<p>* <em>MM: Starks is as explosive as he was in playoffs. Think he looks more powerful than last year. Has had excellent camp.</em></p>
<p>(that last one presumably a report from McCarthey&#8217;s after-practice presser)</p>
<p>This could be really good&#8211;if the Packers have Grant and Starks as a one-two punch for the running game, and Rodgers passing to that receiving corps&#8230; wow.  I&#8217;m trying to maintain a reasonable level of expectations here, but this could be a really good season.</p>
<p>D&isin;T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/08/03/woodson-packers-ready-for-a-run/#comment-13686</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Travis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 21:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=7492#comment-13686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/04/cap-room-snapshot-as-of-thursday/


Well, apparently the Pack stand at 11 mil. We might as well try and lock somebody up, with so many key players nearing the end of their contracts.

We could also bring in a guy or two at linebacker, and D line to add more depth. Depends on the situation. But if we are ok in depth, we should try and extend somebody like Finley or Nelson.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/04/cap-room-snapshot-as-of-thursday/" rel="nofollow">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/04/cap-room-snapshot-as-of-thursday/</a></p>
<p>Well, apparently the Pack stand at 11 mil. We might as well try and lock somebody up, with so many key players nearing the end of their contracts.</p>
<p>We could also bring in a guy or two at linebacker, and D line to add more depth. Depends on the situation. But if we are ok in depth, we should try and extend somebody like Finley or Nelson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pkrNboro</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/08/03/woodson-packers-ready-for-a-run/#comment-13685</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pkrNboro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 17:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=7492#comment-13685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I think GB could use one more DLineman, I think CJ Wilson is legit.  2nd game last year, his pressure late in the game drew a hold -- that wiped out a sure sack.

He pressured the pocket; he drove his opponent backward.

Although listed at 290, I&#039;ve heard he&#039;s put on 10-15 pounds -- and that it&#039;s muscle and he looks good -- which will help against the run...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I think GB could use one more DLineman, I think CJ Wilson is legit.  2nd game last year, his pressure late in the game drew a hold &#8212; that wiped out a sure sack.</p>
<p>He pressured the pocket; he drove his opponent backward.</p>
<p>Although listed at 290, I&#8217;ve heard he&#8217;s put on 10-15 pounds &#8212; and that it&#8217;s muscle and he looks good &#8212; which will help against the run&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Packers Blog Roundup: Battle For Right Outside Linebacker Takes Shape &#124; Cheesehead TV</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/08/03/woodson-packers-ready-for-a-run/#comment-13684</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Packers Blog Roundup: Battle For Right Outside Linebacker Takes Shape &#124; Cheesehead TV]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 14:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=7492#comment-13684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] ability to repeat as Super Bowl champs is given some consideration by Andy Hayes of packergeeks. &quot;Despite some of these lingering [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ability to repeat as Super Bowl champs is given some consideration by Andy Hayes of packergeeks. &quot;Despite some of these lingering [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tangysizzl</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/08/03/woodson-packers-ready-for-a-run/#comment-13682</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tangysizzl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 02:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=7492#comment-13682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All the talk right now is about the Eagles and the Patriots, who would have thought GB would be an afterthought at this point already this season.

I totally agree that this team is even better than last year. No glaring weaknesses and possibly addition by subtraction with Colledge leaving in FA. Lang will win the LG spot and we will forget all about the inconsistant Colledge by game 1 of the regular season.

The D line and ILB are the only true ?s on this team and I have full faith TT and co will not leave the Pack vulnerable at either position. 

Charles Woodson is the man, I love that guy and will always be thankful he became a Packer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the talk right now is about the Eagles and the Patriots, who would have thought GB would be an afterthought at this point already this season.</p>
<p>I totally agree that this team is even better than last year. No glaring weaknesses and possibly addition by subtraction with Colledge leaving in FA. Lang will win the LG spot and we will forget all about the inconsistant Colledge by game 1 of the regular season.</p>
<p>The D line and ILB are the only true ?s on this team and I have full faith TT and co will not leave the Pack vulnerable at either position. </p>
<p>Charles Woodson is the man, I love that guy and will always be thankful he became a Packer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RayMidge</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/08/03/woodson-packers-ready-for-a-run/#comment-13680</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RayMidge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 22:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=7492#comment-13680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent points.  The &quot;luck&quot; at work last year was some early bad luck- two overtime losses along with some other close losses.  The team that went on the playoff run was more reflective of what the internal statistics said about the Packers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent points.  The &#8220;luck&#8221; at work last year was some early bad luck- two overtime losses along with some other close losses.  The team that went on the playoff run was more reflective of what the internal statistics said about the Packers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave in Tucson</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/08/03/woodson-packers-ready-for-a-run/#comment-13679</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave in Tucson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 22:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=7492#comment-13679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, for the regular season, the reason we won as much as we did was 1) One of the best defenses in the league (and, in terms of points allowed, the best Packer D since 1996), and 2) a passing game that at least sometimes got on track.

I remember what it was like going into the playoffs.  I fully expected the Packers&#039; (as you say) marginal running game would lead to a loss in the playoffs.  That first week, I was just hoping for one win,  or at least a game that didn&#039;t turn into an embarrassment by halftime.  It wasn&#039;t really until after the win @ the Falcons I felt like they had a real chance to get to the Super Bowl.

The struggles the Packers had in 2010 can basically be explained by injuries to key players (including Rodgers and Matthews), along with TT/MM&#039;s ability to take late-round and undrafted players and make difference-makers out of them.  (You guys remember how we got Ryan Grant, right?  He was on the Giants&#039; &lt;em&gt;practice squad&lt;/em&gt;, and we traded a 6th-round pick for him.  Some deal, huh?)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, for the regular season, the reason we won as much as we did was 1) One of the best defenses in the league (and, in terms of points allowed, the best Packer D since 1996), and 2) a passing game that at least sometimes got on track.</p>
<p>I remember what it was like going into the playoffs.  I fully expected the Packers&#8217; (as you say) marginal running game would lead to a loss in the playoffs.  That first week, I was just hoping for one win,  or at least a game that didn&#8217;t turn into an embarrassment by halftime.  It wasn&#8217;t really until after the win @ the Falcons I felt like they had a real chance to get to the Super Bowl.</p>
<p>The struggles the Packers had in 2010 can basically be explained by injuries to key players (including Rodgers and Matthews), along with TT/MM&#8217;s ability to take late-round and undrafted players and make difference-makers out of them.  (You guys remember how we got Ryan Grant, right?  He was on the Giants&#8217; <em>practice squad</em>, and we traded a 6th-round pick for him.  Some deal, huh?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awhayes</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/08/03/woodson-packers-ready-for-a-run/#comment-13678</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[awhayes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 20:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=7492#comment-13678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The marginal running game comment was referring to the whole season. We did open the running game up some in the playoffs, but for the season as a whole, we had a weak running game.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The marginal running game comment was referring to the whole season. We did open the running game up some in the playoffs, but for the season as a whole, we had a weak running game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave In Tucson</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/08/03/woodson-packers-ready-for-a-run/#comment-13677</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave In Tucson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 20:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=7492#comment-13677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1. WRT to the struggles on offense: I really don&#039;t think you have to look any further than the fact that we were missing our #1 RB and #1 TE for most of the season.  The Packers are a team that likes to use tight ends &lt;em&gt;a lot&lt;/em&gt;, and it hurt when we lost Finley.  It also hurt that there was such a big drop-off to the next best TE.

2. WRT the playoffs: 

--I don&#039;t think it&#039;s fair to say we steam-rolled through the playoffs.  Except for the Divisional game @ the Falcons, every game came right down to the end, with the defense making one last play to win the game.

--It&#039;s not fair to call the running game (at least in the playoffs) marginal either.  138 yards @ the Eagles, 96 @ the Falcons, 120 @ the Bears... the Super Bowl was the only game was weak (50 yards!)  But that was a play-calling issue: only 11 running plays (and a couple kneel-downs).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. WRT to the struggles on offense: I really don&#8217;t think you have to look any further than the fact that we were missing our #1 RB and #1 TE for most of the season.  The Packers are a team that likes to use tight ends <em>a lot</em>, and it hurt when we lost Finley.  It also hurt that there was such a big drop-off to the next best TE.</p>
<p>2. WRT the playoffs: </p>
<p>&#8211;I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s fair to say we steam-rolled through the playoffs.  Except for the Divisional game @ the Falcons, every game came right down to the end, with the defense making one last play to win the game.</p>
<p>&#8211;It&#8217;s not fair to call the running game (at least in the playoffs) marginal either.  138 yards @ the Eagles, 96 @ the Falcons, 120 @ the Bears&#8230; the Super Bowl was the only game was weak (50 yards!)  But that was a play-calling issue: only 11 running plays (and a couple kneel-downs).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nTracks</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2011/08/03/woodson-packers-ready-for-a-run/#comment-13676</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nTracks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 16:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=7492#comment-13676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[love Woodson&#039;s quote! hopefully special teams can come together and we&#039;ll be golden!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>love Woodson&#8217;s quote! hopefully special teams can come together and we&#8217;ll be golden!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
