Comments on: Interesting article re Packers’ running game http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2010/10/13/interesting-article-re-packers-running-game/ All Things Green Bay Packers Fri, 17 May 2013 23:13:50 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: awhayes http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2010/10/13/interesting-article-re-packers-running-game/#comment-10814 Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:34:45 +0000 http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=5401#comment-10814 Hey English Cheesehead – welcome to Packergeeks. (big fan of England as a travel destination by the way…studied in Scotland and really enjoyed visiting the western parts of England in particular…)

Solid point.

And well said Jim as well…

]]> By: English Cheesehead http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2010/10/13/interesting-article-re-packers-running-game/#comment-10811 Fri, 15 Oct 2010 04:52:09 +0000 http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=5401#comment-10811 The trouble now with the mounting injury list, TT is probably less inclined to bring an accomplished RB in (if indeed he had any inclination in the first place).

]]> By: jimthepackertfan http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2010/10/13/interesting-article-re-packers-running-game/#comment-10809 Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:52:19 +0000 http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=5401#comment-10809 i understand that green bay builds threw the draft and i actually agree with it but there are times that bringing in a player or two can make a world of difference. look at ne, minn, no, phil, and even seattle they all saw a need and went and got someone. are season is going down the drain quick and u could make a case its ALL related to the loss of grant and we seem to be content on keeping all draft picks and filling the need “next year”. without a running game, or even the threat of one, the defense can tee off on rodgers and the effect of that is now a concussion to are franchise player. also the other effect of pressure on any qb is hurries which logic would tell you interceptions will be more likely and because of this we also can say goodbye for the year to finley. and lastly no running game means less time of posession which means more time on the field for ours defense which logic would lead you to believe that could also result in more injuries with overworked defenders. does any of this make sense when the addition of a running game may of changed alot are whole approach and the cost would have been either a 3rd(lynch) or 2nd (d williams). it seems like a snowball effect has started on what should have been a very sucessful season.

]]> By: Daybreak Doppler: I’ll Take Back-Up Tight Ends for a 800, Alex | PocketDoppler.com http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2010/10/13/interesting-article-re-packers-running-game/#comment-10808 Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:11:14 +0000 http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=5401#comment-10808 [...] Packer Geeks has a take on an interesting article on the Packers’ running game. [...]

]]> By: awhayes http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2010/10/13/interesting-article-re-packers-running-game/#comment-10787 Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:30:51 +0000 http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=5401#comment-10787 ummm, ok.

]]> By: en yeni oyunlar http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2010/10/13/interesting-article-re-packers-running-game/#comment-10786 Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:58:03 +0000 http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=5401#comment-10786 The Caps suffered from the same sloppy play that cost them the season opener against Atlanta, but Ottawa left too many chances on the table.

]]>