Comments on: Main concern for Packers/Bears game

By: DaveK

DaveK — Tue, 28 Sep 2010 00:01:56 +0000

Harris was benched for a game last year because of ‘personal conduct’.
Listening to Chicago sports radio this week the radio guys seemed real high on his replacement Matt Toeina. They seem to think he can provide better inside pressure then Harris. But, I doubt they make Harris inactive even if Toeina won the starting job unless Harris rubbed the coaches the wrong way again this year.

By: Tom Freeman

Tom Freeman — Mon, 27 Sep 2010 23:55:55 +0000

I wonder what the deal is with Tommie Harris being declared inactive as a coach’s decision? There is some kind of a story there. Heck, Braylon Edwards was only held out of the game yesterday for one quarter, despite his arrest for drunk driving.

By: 56coop

56coop — Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:47:00 +0000

I’m with you on the Chicago defense. Yeah they almost lost to Detroit and NE almost lost to BUffalo yesterday. Pack needs to be on their game and ready to adjust. This should be a hell of a game and show if in fact the BEars are for real (And the Pack for that matter)

By: Trav

Trav — Mon, 27 Sep 2010 20:30:45 +0000

Interesting point I heard on ESPN Milwaukee this lunchtime. Dallas has Ware, who is a great pass rusher, similar to the much deserved hype that Matthews is getting. I didn’t look at the stats of the game, but evidently Chi schemed to keep Ware in check and he was a non-factor. Will we potentially see the same tonight if they employ the same scheme? Will Capers adjust? Will someone else step up if they contain Matthews? Will the Bears try something else? I guess we will find out in about 4 hours.

By: ebongreen

ebongreen — Mon, 27 Sep 2010 18:21:28 +0000

I think the game will be competitive, but I do think the Bears will still lose.

The Bears have beaten the Lions by knocking Stafford out of the game and a wacky rule on the final play, and beat the Cowboys by letting the Cowboys mostly beat themselves. Their defense is stout, but I don’t think their offense is nearly as good as they think – particularly the O-line. They’re a couple of plays from being 0-2 rather than 2-0.

Honestly, this game could boil down to a passing frenzy as neither team may be able to run the ball, and I have a little more confidence in the Packers defense and pass rush – which has more scheme to it and a young healthy Clay Matthews – vs. the Bears offensive line. The Bears pass rush features Peppers and Tommie Harris, who are both good and old, vs. the Packers offensive line and depth to keep rushers off Rodgers’ back. I believe the Packers receiver corps is better in production than the Bears, though Chicago has the edge in pure speed with Hester and Knox. The Bears don’t have Charles Woodson and they don’t have a comparable player to Nick Collins either.

In the end, the Packers are a more talented team, and they should prevail – but it should also be a good game.

By: DaveK

DaveK — Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:02:21 +0000

I agree. Running effectively enough to keep the defense honest is always a key cog is breaking down an effective cover 2 defense. If you can’t run effectively it allows that front four to get QB pressure which really is the key to Lovie’s Tampa 2 defense. If they can get Jackson going early it slows down those DE’s and will suck up the LB’s to allow some passing lanes to open up. Run well and you can exploit that below average Bear’s secondary.

I think the Bear’s defense has not been tested this year with a balanced functional offense. Against the Lions they fell behind 14-3 with Best running for two TD’s. Stafford got hurt at the end of the first half, the Bears stacked the box to stop Best, and the Lions offense was abysmal the rest of the game until the final drive. They were playing a bad team with a back-up QB.

I didn’t see much of the Cowboy/Bear game. From what I have read the Cowboys offense was sloppy with penalties, a reeling o-line, and costly turnovers. Romo threw 51 passes with only 18 rushes which the Dallas media has taken them to task over. This was the same Dallas offense that put up only 7 points against the Redskins in week one. St. Louis scored 30 against the Skins yesterday!

I think the Packers offense will fare fine tonight. Protecting the ball will always be key against the Bears. (Note to James Jones please) If they protect the ball and run well enough to keep the defense honest I think the Packers offense will score enough to win.

I have more concerns about the Packer defense. I worry about Forte out of the back-field the most. That little Martz swing pass to the RB or running Forte out on passing routs off motion has a real chance to cause problems for the Packer LB’s and young secondary. But, the Packers will handle that and just make life miserable for Cutler tonight. Cutler returns to last year’s form and the Packers roll.

My prediction: Packers 31 Bears 17

By: CindyV

CindyV — Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:12:01 +0000

I’ve already got butterflies in my stomach over this game. I was just talking to a co-worker this morning about the Bears defense and how concerned I am about it. The Bears really made an effort in free agency to boost their team. This will nto be an esay game.