<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TT have concerns about our present d-line?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2010/04/24/tt-have-concerns-about-our-present-d-line/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2010/04/24/tt-have-concerns-about-our-present-d-line/</link>
	<description>All Things Green Bay Packers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 08:09:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RayMidge</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2010/04/24/tt-have-concerns-about-our-present-d-line/#comment-9429</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RayMidge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 22:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=4786#comment-9429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had the same thought re: Bishop . . . not drafting any LBs may mean he gets more of a shot.

Overall, I was confused about the general direction of the draft, like a lot of us I assumed we&#039;d see CBs and LBs, but I think the instant-analysis culture feeds overreaction.  Plenty of drafts have ended with the Pack being praised and than the guys didn&#039;t pan out.  In general I like the idea of picking linemen on both sides of the ball because you can never have too many of them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the same thought re: Bishop . . . not drafting any LBs may mean he gets more of a shot.</p>
<p>Overall, I was confused about the general direction of the draft, like a lot of us I assumed we&#8217;d see CBs and LBs, but I think the instant-analysis culture feeds overreaction.  Plenty of drafts have ended with the Pack being praised and than the guys didn&#8217;t pan out.  In general I like the idea of picking linemen on both sides of the ball because you can never have too many of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schaefer</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2010/04/24/tt-have-concerns-about-our-present-d-line/#comment-9423</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schaefer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 15:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=4786#comment-9423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like the draft, and think we addressed a lot of needs - not sure I agree about Quarless, but he is a very good player - but overall I like it. and as for the the free agent signees I like these two:

OT Chris Campbell, Eastern Illinois
&quot;A report in Sporting News has him as a sleeper in the draft and rated as high as the No. 10 offensive tackle available.&quot;

QB Noah Shepard, South Dakota
“I still see it as a big chip on my shoulder that I wasn’t drafted, though. I still have something to prove and I’m looking forward to getting to Green Bay.”]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the draft, and think we addressed a lot of needs &#8211; not sure I agree about Quarless, but he is a very good player &#8211; but overall I like it. and as for the the free agent signees I like these two:</p>
<p>OT Chris Campbell, Eastern Illinois<br />
&#8220;A report in Sporting News has him as a sleeper in the draft and rated as high as the No. 10 offensive tackle available.&#8221;</p>
<p>QB Noah Shepard, South Dakota<br />
“I still see it as a big chip on my shoulder that I wasn’t drafted, though. I still have something to prove and I’m looking forward to getting to Green Bay.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
