<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some stats to chew on</title>
	<atom:link href="http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/11/24/some-stats-to-chew-on/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/11/24/some-stats-to-chew-on/</link>
	<description>All Things Green Bay Packers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 08:09:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave In Tucson</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/11/24/some-stats-to-chew-on/#comment-8265</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave In Tucson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=4099#comment-8265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Josh, you need to use &lt; and &gt; (including trailing semicolon) to have a literal &lt; and &gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh, you need to use &amp;lt; and &amp;gt; (including trailing semicolon) to have a literal &lt; and &gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joshywoshybigfatposhy</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/11/24/some-stats-to-chew-on/#comment-8264</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joshywoshybigfatposhy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=4099#comment-8264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[woah - that didn&#039;t work.  just go to dave&#039;s link and scroll down i suppose.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>woah &#8211; that didn&#8217;t work.  just go to dave&#8217;s link and scroll down i suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joshywoshybigfatposhy</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/11/24/some-stats-to-chew-on/#comment-8263</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joshywoshybigfatposhy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=4099#comment-8263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[dave, this bit from football outsiders is brilliant:

To save people some time, please use the following format for all complaints:  is clearly ranked  because .  is way better than this. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dave, this bit from football outsiders is brilliant:</p>
<p>To save people some time, please use the following format for all complaints:  is clearly ranked  because .  is way better than this. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Packers Daily Links 11.25.09 - Railbird Central</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/11/24/some-stats-to-chew-on/#comment-8262</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Packers Daily Links 11.25.09 - Railbird Central]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=4099#comment-8262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Hayes of packergeeks found a slew of interesting statistics. Among the most surprising, &quot;The Packers have committed the 7th FEWEST penalties as a defense.&quot; There&#039;s [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hayes of packergeeks found a slew of interesting statistics. Among the most surprising, &quot;The Packers have committed the 7th FEWEST penalties as a defense.&quot; There&#39;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trav</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/11/24/some-stats-to-chew-on/#comment-8261</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trav]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=4099#comment-8261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[joshy - you&#039;re on a hot streak here.   Keep it going.  High quality work! 

Happy Thanksgiving to everyone!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>joshy &#8211; you&#8217;re on a hot streak here.   Keep it going.  High quality work! </p>
<p>Happy Thanksgiving to everyone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave In Tucson</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/11/24/some-stats-to-chew-on/#comment-8260</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave In Tucson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 06:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=4099#comment-8260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was just looking at the Packers &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballoutsiders.com/dvoa-ratings/2009/week-11-dvoa-ratings&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Week 11 DVOA Ratings&lt;/a&gt;.

Offense: #4.  Defense: #1.  Special teams: #31.

Yikes.  That&#039;s one really bad problem.  (Oh, yeah--Special teams #32?  That would be the Steelers).

D&#8712;T]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just looking at the Packers <a href="http://www.footballoutsiders.com/dvoa-ratings/2009/week-11-dvoa-ratings" rel="nofollow">Week 11 DVOA Ratings</a>.</p>
<p>Offense: #4.  Defense: #1.  Special teams: #31.</p>
<p>Yikes.  That&#8217;s one really bad problem.  (Oh, yeah&#8211;Special teams #32?  That would be the Steelers).</p>
<p>D&isin;T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 56Coop</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/11/24/some-stats-to-chew-on/#comment-8258</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[56Coop]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=4099#comment-8258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Happy Thanksgiving Packergeeks. Be back on Friday.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy Thanksgiving Packergeeks. Be back on Friday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 56Coop</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/11/24/some-stats-to-chew-on/#comment-8257</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[56Coop]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=4099#comment-8257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having a terrible day here.  Thanks for the laugh joshy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having a terrible day here.  Thanks for the laugh joshy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joshywoshybigfatposhy</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/11/24/some-stats-to-chew-on/#comment-8256</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joshywoshybigfatposhy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=4099#comment-8256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[great collection there.  i&#039;m absolutely flabbergasted that grant is the #9 back in the league average-wise right now.  does he have incentives in his contract?  think of what our running game could be if mccarthy called 25-30 running plays per game.  

here are two more stats i found:

- if brett favre wins an mvp and a superbowl, 38% of packer fans will end it all, 93% will vomit all over their new shoes, and 29% of favre-detractors will claim they supported him all the way, buy a #4 jersey, go out into the backyard with it and rub dirt on it so it looks at least 24 months old.

-if brett favre wins an mvp, throws 59 touchdowns, has a passer rating of 154.45, but contributes to his team&#039;s failure to achieve a superbowl win in ANY WAY - 85% of packer fans will be just fine with that.  if he outright loses a playoff game for his team, packer fans will (rightly) give new meaning to the word &#039;smug.&#039;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great collection there.  i&#8217;m absolutely flabbergasted that grant is the #9 back in the league average-wise right now.  does he have incentives in his contract?  think of what our running game could be if mccarthy called 25-30 running plays per game.  </p>
<p>here are two more stats i found:</p>
<p>- if brett favre wins an mvp and a superbowl, 38% of packer fans will end it all, 93% will vomit all over their new shoes, and 29% of favre-detractors will claim they supported him all the way, buy a #4 jersey, go out into the backyard with it and rub dirt on it so it looks at least 24 months old.</p>
<p>-if brett favre wins an mvp, throws 59 touchdowns, has a passer rating of 154.45, but contributes to his team&#8217;s failure to achieve a superbowl win in ANY WAY &#8211; 85% of packer fans will be just fine with that.  if he outright loses a playoff game for his team, packer fans will (rightly) give new meaning to the word &#8216;smug.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/11/24/some-stats-to-chew-on/#comment-8253</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=4099#comment-8253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The Packers have the #3 ranked defense in yards allowed per game, yet they are ranked 12th in points allowed per game.&quot;

easily explained:  the special teams unit gives the other team such a short field that they simply can&#039;t give up more yards.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Packers have the #3 ranked defense in yards allowed per game, yet they are ranked 12th in points allowed per game.&#8221;</p>
<p>easily explained:  the special teams unit gives the other team such a short field that they simply can&#8217;t give up more yards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
