Comments on: Could Cincy loss be functional?

By: 56Coop

56Coop — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:55:33 +0000

Andy-I hope you are right but frankly I’m starting to lose a little faith in MM. Seems like he’s always got his key little phrases. Last year it was pad levels, this year it’s techniques, fundamentals & communication. Going into the 3rd wek of the season is a bad time to have to be discussing fundamentals. Those should be instinctual.

It’s like his inability (or is it down right stibborness) to make adjustments during the game. Seems like he gets a plan and come hell or high water that’s the way it is. Hopefully you are right though. Maybe a good wake up call is what they needed. I do think this Sunday needs to be an absolute domination. If it’s close then I am intotla agreement I am in total agreement about the nactmares & the goggles.

And a big Amen about the dropped passes. Very uncharacteristic.

By: Dave in Tucson

Dave in Tucson — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 05:41:53 +0000

The loss to the Bengals (along with the less-than-convincing win over the Bears) has left me in a rather pessemistic mood.

If the Packers aren’t ahead by 3 scores at the end of the 3rd quarter… I recommend we all avert our eyes for the rest of the season. Because the goggles, they do nothing.

D∈T

By: Ron La Canne

Ron La Canne — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 02:24:31 +0000

I want you to be clairvoyant Andy. If they blow this one, very bad things will probably happen for the remainder of the season.I haven’t gone to bed yet and my nachtmares (credit Mel Brooks) of Colledge lined up on Allen have already started.

Keeping a positive attitude I’m going for a blow out. Packers 44 St Louis 7. They’ll hold Jackson to 60 Yards on the groung.

By: Rich Beckman

Rich Beckman — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:19:46 +0000

Good points. Particularly the last one.

Lots to blame for last week’s loss, but it all started with those dropped passes.