<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 38-10, quality, quality effort</title>
	<atom:link href="http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/08/29/38-10-quality-quality-effort/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/08/29/38-10-quality-quality-effort/</link>
	<description>All Things Green Bay Packers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 08:09:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 56Coop</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/08/29/38-10-quality-quality-effort/#comment-7001</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[56Coop]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=3329#comment-7001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanx Mike--U R right--Landshark Stadium--Wonder if Buffett&#039;s gonna be halftime entertainment?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanx Mike&#8211;U R right&#8211;Landshark Stadium&#8211;Wonder if Buffett&#8217;s gonna be halftime entertainment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cindyvvideo</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/08/29/38-10-quality-quality-effort/#comment-6992</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cindyvvideo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 17:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=3329#comment-6992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This from Peter King this morning:

Regarding the Packers, their first unit has had 12 possessions this summer and hasn&#039;t punted. Sixty-six points in 12 possessions ... just sick. And the starting defense has forced six turnovers in 12 opposing possessions.

&quot;Three games, no punts, 31 points in this game,&#039;&#039; said Aaron Rodgers, who&#039;s looking more like Brett Favre than Favre. &quot;The line was great [Friday against Arizona]. I barely got touched. It was just pitch and catch out there.&#039;&#039; 

What makes Mike McCarthy happy is that a year after L&#039;Affair Favre, Rodgers seems to have the team in his hands. &quot;It&#039;s clearly Aaron&#039;s team,&#039;&#039; McCarthy said Sunday



Read more: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writers/peter_king/08/30/mmqb/1.html#ixzz0PmYfj0R1]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This from Peter King this morning:</p>
<p>Regarding the Packers, their first unit has had 12 possessions this summer and hasn&#8217;t punted. Sixty-six points in 12 possessions &#8230; just sick. And the starting defense has forced six turnovers in 12 opposing possessions.</p>
<p>&#8220;Three games, no punts, 31 points in this game,&#8221; said Aaron Rodgers, who&#8217;s looking more like Brett Favre than Favre. &#8220;The line was great [Friday against Arizona]. I barely got touched. It was just pitch and catch out there.&#8221; </p>
<p>What makes Mike McCarthy happy is that a year after L&#8217;Affair Favre, Rodgers seems to have the team in his hands. &#8220;It&#8217;s clearly Aaron&#8217;s team,&#8221; McCarthy said Sunday</p>
<p>Read more: <a href="http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writers/peter_king/08/30/mmqb/1.html#ixzz0PmYfj0R1" rel="nofollow">http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writers/peter_king/08/30/mmqb/1.html#ixzz0PmYfj0R1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DreamPipe</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/08/29/38-10-quality-quality-effort/#comment-6981</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DreamPipe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 01:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=3329#comment-6981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hayes &amp; Gang, take a look: http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/ic/blogs/insider/2009/08/woodson-packers-can-win-it-all.html

Nick Barnett tweeted this article, the Pack D can feel it!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hayes &amp; Gang, take a look: <a href="http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/ic/blogs/insider/2009/08/woodson-packers-can-win-it-all.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/ic/blogs/insider/2009/08/woodson-packers-can-win-it-all.html</a></p>
<p>Nick Barnett tweeted this article, the Pack D can feel it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 56Coop</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/08/29/38-10-quality-quality-effort/#comment-6979</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[56Coop]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 17:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=3329#comment-6979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welll Guys-I got to watch the first half of the game last night &amp; I&#039;m not as warm &amp; fuzzy as I was before watching it.  I will say first of all that it was finally good to see all the penalties called against the other team &amp; not us.  Appears to me while our defense is solid &amp; as Ron says are agressive &amp; emotional but we can still be ran on.  It appears we&#039;re pretty good at stopping up the middle runs but it seemed to me outside containment broke down quickly &amp; the corner could be turned on us too often.  I am totally in for the new scheme however.  I like the fact that they can see the ball better &amp; Woodson is just a horse at whatever he&#039;s asked to do.  Hawk needs to become the player he&#039;s supposed to be.

Offense running game has improved but still needs to keep chugging.  Hope we keep Grant, Jackson &amp; Sutton.  Seems we are getting to 2nd level a bit more often now we need backs to get some misses and tear off some long runs.  Aaron said in one interview that he was barely touched all night.  I didn&#039;t see that.  Protection is better but still needs work.  Obviously, if Rodgers goes down, we&#039;re done.  He is a very good (great almost came out of my mouth) QB.  As stated by Andy, great passes of all knds, good reads, excellent mobility &amp; very good feet.  HAte to see him run though simply for fear of injury.  The couple of runs he did in that game were very smart &amp; he avoided contact.  I&#039;m just afraid we are depending a little too much on the long ball &amp; teams can game plan against that very easliy.  The game I watched featured the Cardinals announcers in the booth and they stated a couple time that the Cards had not game planned for the Packers which is typical in preseason games I supose.

At any rate, much happier with the prospects for this season but don&#039;t put us in Tampa yet.  I do like the coaching on both sides -- now all 53 that remain have to really step up &amp; play to their potential.  We have to get the NFC North back-- I think we stack up to any North team but it is going to be an interesting year.  Couple bad calls, couple mental mistakes, couple injuries &amp; this division goes many different ways.

Just MHO.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welll Guys-I got to watch the first half of the game last night &amp; I&#8217;m not as warm &amp; fuzzy as I was before watching it.  I will say first of all that it was finally good to see all the penalties called against the other team &amp; not us.  Appears to me while our defense is solid &amp; as Ron says are agressive &amp; emotional but we can still be ran on.  It appears we&#8217;re pretty good at stopping up the middle runs but it seemed to me outside containment broke down quickly &amp; the corner could be turned on us too often.  I am totally in for the new scheme however.  I like the fact that they can see the ball better &amp; Woodson is just a horse at whatever he&#8217;s asked to do.  Hawk needs to become the player he&#8217;s supposed to be.</p>
<p>Offense running game has improved but still needs to keep chugging.  Hope we keep Grant, Jackson &amp; Sutton.  Seems we are getting to 2nd level a bit more often now we need backs to get some misses and tear off some long runs.  Aaron said in one interview that he was barely touched all night.  I didn&#8217;t see that.  Protection is better but still needs work.  Obviously, if Rodgers goes down, we&#8217;re done.  He is a very good (great almost came out of my mouth) QB.  As stated by Andy, great passes of all knds, good reads, excellent mobility &amp; very good feet.  HAte to see him run though simply for fear of injury.  The couple of runs he did in that game were very smart &amp; he avoided contact.  I&#8217;m just afraid we are depending a little too much on the long ball &amp; teams can game plan against that very easliy.  The game I watched featured the Cardinals announcers in the booth and they stated a couple time that the Cards had not game planned for the Packers which is typical in preseason games I supose.</p>
<p>At any rate, much happier with the prospects for this season but don&#8217;t put us in Tampa yet.  I do like the coaching on both sides &#8212; now all 53 that remain have to really step up &amp; play to their potential.  We have to get the NFC North back&#8211; I think we stack up to any North team but it is going to be an interesting year.  Couple bad calls, couple mental mistakes, couple injuries &amp; this division goes many different ways.</p>
<p>Just MHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aristomenes</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/08/29/38-10-quality-quality-effort/#comment-6978</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aristomenes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 06:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=3329#comment-6978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[19-0, baby!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>19-0, baby!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Dixon</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/08/29/38-10-quality-quality-effort/#comment-6977</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Dixon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 04:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=3329#comment-6977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FYI, The Superbowl in 2010 will be in Miami not Tampa Tampa is where it was this year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI, The Superbowl in 2010 will be in Miami not Tampa Tampa is where it was this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron La Canne</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/08/29/38-10-quality-quality-effort/#comment-6973</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron La Canne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 23:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=3329#comment-6973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dave, In normal circumstances I&#039;d agree.  This year, however, the Packers are playing with emotion and attacking very aggressively on both sides of the ball.  It&#039;s not the wins to me.  It&#039;s the way they are playing the game that give me hope for this season.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, In normal circumstances I&#8217;d agree.  This year, however, the Packers are playing with emotion and attacking very aggressively on both sides of the ball.  It&#8217;s not the wins to me.  It&#8217;s the way they are playing the game that give me hope for this season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave in Tucson</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/08/29/38-10-quality-quality-effort/#comment-6972</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave in Tucson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 23:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=3329#comment-6972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t want to be too much of a wet blanket, but... let&#039;s not get too excited here.  It&#039;s just the preseason.  Teams prepare a lot more, and play a lot harder, when they start counting wins and losses.

Oh yeah: the last time the Pack went 4-0 in the preseason?  That was the year Ray Rhodes was HC.  Which resulted in a very sloppy 8-8 finish to the regular season.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t want to be too much of a wet blanket, but&#8230; let&#8217;s not get too excited here.  It&#8217;s just the preseason.  Teams prepare a lot more, and play a lot harder, when they start counting wins and losses.</p>
<p>Oh yeah: the last time the Pack went 4-0 in the preseason?  That was the year Ray Rhodes was HC.  Which resulted in a very sloppy 8-8 finish to the regular season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FITZCORE1252</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/08/29/38-10-quality-quality-effort/#comment-6971</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FITZCORE1252]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 22:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=3329#comment-6971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t see  a scenario that we lose to the bears week 1. Thoughts?


GBP 4 LIFE]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see  a scenario that we lose to the bears week 1. Thoughts?</p>
<p>GBP 4 LIFE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 56Coop</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/08/29/38-10-quality-quality-effort/#comment-6970</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[56Coop]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 19:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=3329#comment-6970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As fans we certainly can look forward to Tampa--but as players they need to look no further than next Sunday.  OF course with the guys at this blog I probably just wasted 5 minutes of my life typiing this--it&#039;s pretty obvious.....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As fans we certainly can look forward to Tampa&#8211;but as players they need to look no further than next Sunday.  OF course with the guys at this blog I probably just wasted 5 minutes of my life typiing this&#8211;it&#8217;s pretty obvious&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
