<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Optimism for Pack from USAToday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/05/28/optimism-for-pack-from-usatoday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/05/28/optimism-for-pack-from-usatoday/</link>
	<description>All Things Green Bay Packers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 08:09:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/05/28/optimism-for-pack-from-usatoday/#comment-6536</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 03:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=3149#comment-6536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My sense is the offense will be at least as good as last year.  The big advantage they can give themselves is to settle on a starting line-up as soon as possible and stick with it.  This will give Grant and others a boost. 

I think the defense will struggle early and come on by mid-year at the latest.  Seems we may not see as much of the 3-4 as some might think and as long as we stay healthly I don&#039;t see the defense doing any worse than last year.

Here&#039;s my kicker (no pun intended), I think special teams could be the real difference maker in 2009.  Think about how many yards we spotted our opponents last year by absolute crummy punting.  Crosby wasn&#039;t himself and missed a few that could have been the difference maker.  Mathematically speaking, I&#039;m not sure that Bush can get more ST penalties than last year either!

On the downside for the Packers, I think there has been a very good upgrade of talent throughout the NFC North so it won&#039;t be a walk in the park.  I think it&#039;s realistic to think we finish 10-6 but not comfortable we beat out MN for the division crown.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My sense is the offense will be at least as good as last year.  The big advantage they can give themselves is to settle on a starting line-up as soon as possible and stick with it.  This will give Grant and others a boost. </p>
<p>I think the defense will struggle early and come on by mid-year at the latest.  Seems we may not see as much of the 3-4 as some might think and as long as we stay healthly I don&#8217;t see the defense doing any worse than last year.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my kicker (no pun intended), I think special teams could be the real difference maker in 2009.  Think about how many yards we spotted our opponents last year by absolute crummy punting.  Crosby wasn&#8217;t himself and missed a few that could have been the difference maker.  Mathematically speaking, I&#8217;m not sure that Bush can get more ST penalties than last year either!</p>
<p>On the downside for the Packers, I think there has been a very good upgrade of talent throughout the NFC North so it won&#8217;t be a walk in the park.  I think it&#8217;s realistic to think we finish 10-6 but not comfortable we beat out MN for the division crown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/05/28/optimism-for-pack-from-usatoday/#comment-6396</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 03:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=3149#comment-6396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sure, he rushed for over 1200 yards (and I think that was good for 9th in the NFL) but he had only two rushes for over 20 yards (as opposed to something like nine, I believe, in half a season in 2007) and his yard per carry dropped down to 3.9. So, seems like the overall production was there, but he didn&#039;t play up to my expectations. I think he&#039;ll be closer to his 2007 form, rather than last year, come opening week. At least I hope he will.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, he rushed for over 1200 yards (and I think that was good for 9th in the NFL) but he had only two rushes for over 20 yards (as opposed to something like nine, I believe, in half a season in 2007) and his yard per carry dropped down to 3.9. So, seems like the overall production was there, but he didn&#8217;t play up to my expectations. I think he&#8217;ll be closer to his 2007 form, rather than last year, come opening week. At least I hope he will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: verno329</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/05/28/optimism-for-pack-from-usatoday/#comment-6390</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[verno329]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 20:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=3149#comment-6390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That seemed like a pretty solid review/preview of the team.  I loved hearing abut the D going through training and schooling on the 3-4 so they can be as prepared as possible.  Hopefully it pays big dividends.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That seemed like a pretty solid review/preview of the team.  I loved hearing abut the D going through training and schooling on the 3-4 so they can be as prepared as possible.  Hopefully it pays big dividends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
