<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Plax to Bears or Vikes&#8230;or, gulp, the Lions???</title>
	<atom:link href="http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/04/07/plax-to-bears-or-vikesor-gulp-the-lions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/04/07/plax-to-bears-or-vikesor-gulp-the-lions/</link>
	<description>All Things Green Bay Packers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 18:57:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/04/07/plax-to-bears-or-vikesor-gulp-the-lions/#comment-6094</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=3004#comment-6094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey thanks for the compliment. Detroit is run by such numbnuts that they won&#039;t think of this idea, I am sure of it. And is not like I desperately want to help Detroit exactly but if you think about &quot;the enemy of my enemy is my friend&quot; then if Detroit actually gets better, sure they may beat us a few times, but they&#039;ll also beat Chicago and MN, and I don&#039;t see what&#039;s not to like about that. thanks again, now i&#039;ll read your latest posts!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey thanks for the compliment. Detroit is run by such numbnuts that they won&#8217;t think of this idea, I am sure of it. And is not like I desperately want to help Detroit exactly but if you think about &#8220;the enemy of my enemy is my friend&#8221; then if Detroit actually gets better, sure they may beat us a few times, but they&#8217;ll also beat Chicago and MN, and I don&#8217;t see what&#8217;s not to like about that. thanks again, now i&#8217;ll read your latest posts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awhayes</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/04/07/plax-to-bears-or-vikesor-gulp-the-lions/#comment-6079</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[awhayes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 23:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=3004#comment-6079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dan - thanks for reading. We&#039;ll be posting more as the draft and season approach. 

You raise an interesting question. Peter King at Sports Illustrated often argues that teams shouldn&#039;t like selecting toward the top of the draft because it&#039;s much more expensive than mid-first rounders even - best player value is mid to late first round and early second. I like your thought of Detroit just picking another guy who isn&#039;t expected to go as high and trying to negotiate with him. Detroit actually has from now until the draft to work something out with a player, so if they don&#039;t have their minds set on anyone in particular, I actually don&#039;t think your idea is a bad one. 

As far as Harrell - I just don&#039;t know. I also maintain a small bit of hope that he could  at least a body we can rotate in/out, but I&#039;m very doubtful at this point.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan &#8211; thanks for reading. We&#8217;ll be posting more as the draft and season approach. </p>
<p>You raise an interesting question. Peter King at Sports Illustrated often argues that teams shouldn&#8217;t like selecting toward the top of the draft because it&#8217;s much more expensive than mid-first rounders even &#8211; best player value is mid to late first round and early second. I like your thought of Detroit just picking another guy who isn&#8217;t expected to go as high and trying to negotiate with him. Detroit actually has from now until the draft to work something out with a player, so if they don&#8217;t have their minds set on anyone in particular, I actually don&#8217;t think your idea is a bad one. </p>
<p>As far as Harrell &#8211; I just don&#8217;t know. I also maintain a small bit of hope that he could  at least a body we can rotate in/out, but I&#8217;m very doubtful at this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/04/07/plax-to-bears-or-vikesor-gulp-the-lions/#comment-6076</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 20:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=3004#comment-6076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really enjoy the blogging; thank you for taking the time to write these up. They entertain me, at least. I live in CO. There&#039;s a few packer fans here (of course) but you know, people ridicule my adopted hometown Boulder as a &#039;bubble,&#039; but people who are Broncos fans?... talk about living in a bubble. I live in the Broncosphere, a kind of trailer trash version of the biosphere.

What I was wondering if you&#039;d consider addressing this in a future blog, since what happens in our division affect all of us... what are your thoughts about what stops Detroit a) if they really don&#039;t feel that Stafford, etc. represent &quot;true&quot; first player taken in the draft type of talent, and then warrants a consequentially HUGE guaranteed payday and b) they don&#039;t want to foolishly let the &quot;clock&quot; run out, what&#039;s stops them from approaching a quality mid-first round prospect, like a percy harvin or brian cushing, a guy who could be between very solid to excellent on the field, a good player, but not good enough to go first, by consensus, and offer them the fame of going first, and work out a contract before the draft, paying them a little more than what spot they&#039;d, more of less by consensus, likely would fall to, maybe pay them a couple extra million, as a little reward for playing by some new rules. In my opinion, Detroit would be making a mistake not going after one of those Tackles- who woudn&#039;t want to solidify that position for a decade? - or maybe Curry. But what do you think? Why isn&#039;t this option discussed? It seems like a reasonable solution to the issue for them. 

I hope we get Raji, then swing Harrell - if he&#039;s ever healthy- to DE and then boom, I think we&#039;d suddenly have a DLine, let Kampman rush over Harrell&#039;s shoulder while JH consumes a couple OL. That might be a total fantasy but Harrell&#039;s got to have something to offer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really enjoy the blogging; thank you for taking the time to write these up. They entertain me, at least. I live in CO. There&#8217;s a few packer fans here (of course) but you know, people ridicule my adopted hometown Boulder as a &#8216;bubble,&#8217; but people who are Broncos fans?&#8230; talk about living in a bubble. I live in the Broncosphere, a kind of trailer trash version of the biosphere.</p>
<p>What I was wondering if you&#8217;d consider addressing this in a future blog, since what happens in our division affect all of us&#8230; what are your thoughts about what stops Detroit a) if they really don&#8217;t feel that Stafford, etc. represent &#8220;true&#8221; first player taken in the draft type of talent, and then warrants a consequentially HUGE guaranteed payday and b) they don&#8217;t want to foolishly let the &#8220;clock&#8221; run out, what&#8217;s stops them from approaching a quality mid-first round prospect, like a percy harvin or brian cushing, a guy who could be between very solid to excellent on the field, a good player, but not good enough to go first, by consensus, and offer them the fame of going first, and work out a contract before the draft, paying them a little more than what spot they&#8217;d, more of less by consensus, likely would fall to, maybe pay them a couple extra million, as a little reward for playing by some new rules. In my opinion, Detroit would be making a mistake not going after one of those Tackles- who woudn&#8217;t want to solidify that position for a decade? &#8211; or maybe Curry. But what do you think? Why isn&#8217;t this option discussed? It seems like a reasonable solution to the issue for them. </p>
<p>I hope we get Raji, then swing Harrell &#8211; if he&#8217;s ever healthy- to DE and then boom, I think we&#8217;d suddenly have a DLine, let Kampman rush over Harrell&#8217;s shoulder while JH consumes a couple OL. That might be a total fantasy but Harrell&#8217;s got to have something to offer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 56Coop</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/04/07/plax-to-bears-or-vikesor-gulp-the-lions/#comment-6071</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[56Coop]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=3004#comment-6071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK joshy--let&#039;s see, moonshiner on a unicycle, Nike full of johnson residue---you&#039;re getting right up there with Ron at giving me a good laugh--and believe me--the way things are with my business lately I need all of those I can get.  Thanx]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK joshy&#8211;let&#8217;s see, moonshiner on a unicycle, Nike full of johnson residue&#8212;you&#8217;re getting right up there with Ron at giving me a good laugh&#8211;and believe me&#8211;the way things are with my business lately I need all of those I can get.  Thanx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awhayes</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/04/07/plax-to-bears-or-vikesor-gulp-the-lions/#comment-6062</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[awhayes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 20:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=3004#comment-6062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice NYC perspective. I hope you&#039;re right, I really do. I can in fact see a situation exploding if Cutler and Burress were together and Burress had a fit. That thought comforts me some. 

Oh and hey, I wrote that Tarvaris post just for you Josh...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice NYC perspective. I hope you&#8217;re right, I really do. I can in fact see a situation exploding if Cutler and Burress were together and Burress had a fit. That thought comforts me some. </p>
<p>Oh and hey, I wrote that Tarvaris post just for you Josh&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joshywoshybigfatposhy</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/04/07/plax-to-bears-or-vikesor-gulp-the-lions/#comment-6060</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joshywoshybigfatposhy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 19:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=3004#comment-6060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i meant to insert that after the superbowl, he GOT the giant contract - undoubtedly the cause of his ineptitude during 08 - he was too busy hangin&#039; at the club with his un-safety&#039;d glock tucked in his sweatpants.  the man is lucky he&#039;s got a shot-up-foot instead of a nike full of johnson residue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i meant to insert that after the superbowl, he GOT the giant contract &#8211; undoubtedly the cause of his ineptitude during 08 &#8211; he was too busy hangin&#8217; at the club with his un-safety&#8217;d glock tucked in his sweatpants.  the man is lucky he&#8217;s got a shot-up-foot instead of a nike full of johnson residue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joshywoshybigfatposhy</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/04/07/plax-to-bears-or-vikesor-gulp-the-lions/#comment-6059</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joshywoshybigfatposhy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 19:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=3004#comment-6059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[while any addition of a tall, talented wr to a nfc north opponent would be bad news -- as someone forced against his will to live and commute in new york (sports talk radio accompanying), i can tell you that plax will let his off-field issues affect his play.  

two years ago (when he helped them win a superbowl), he was playing for a contract.   i don&#039;t know if he was in a contract year, but he got one before last season.  he proceeded to be a non-factor all season until he shot himself in the foot and didn&#039;t play another down.  

yes, i know he might still give harris trouble - but i think for whatever reason, he is harris&#039; kryptonite.  swing woodson over and we&#039;ll be fine.  

pairing burress with cutler could prove destructive to either the bears OR their opponents.  i think cutler is confident (arrogant) enough that he&#039;d probably have the balls to tell plax to go %#&amp; himself if he got out of hand.  burress in minnesota with two unproven qb&#039;s, throwing balls over his head -- the makings of a classic viking tragedy.  and i don&#039;t think the lions exist yet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>while any addition of a tall, talented wr to a nfc north opponent would be bad news &#8212; as someone forced against his will to live and commute in new york (sports talk radio accompanying), i can tell you that plax will let his off-field issues affect his play.  </p>
<p>two years ago (when he helped them win a superbowl), he was playing for a contract.   i don&#8217;t know if he was in a contract year, but he got one before last season.  he proceeded to be a non-factor all season until he shot himself in the foot and didn&#8217;t play another down.  </p>
<p>yes, i know he might still give harris trouble &#8211; but i think for whatever reason, he is harris&#8217; kryptonite.  swing woodson over and we&#8217;ll be fine.  </p>
<p>pairing burress with cutler could prove destructive to either the bears OR their opponents.  i think cutler is confident (arrogant) enough that he&#8217;d probably have the balls to tell plax to go %#&amp; himself if he got out of hand.  burress in minnesota with two unproven qb&#8217;s, throwing balls over his head &#8212; the makings of a classic viking tragedy.  and i don&#8217;t think the lions exist yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
