<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thompson thinks Packers fine as they are</title>
	<atom:link href="http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/03/25/thompson-thinks-packers-fine-as-they-are/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/03/25/thompson-thinks-packers-fine-as-they-are/</link>
	<description>All Things Green Bay Packers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 08:09:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 56coop</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/03/25/thompson-thinks-packers-fine-as-they-are/#comment-5985</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[56coop]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=2968#comment-5985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I will say that I am glad I am not a GM on an NFL team.  Way too many things to juggle for my feeble mind.  That being said, I also wish TT was not a GM in the NFL--- for the same reason.

Now, I certainly hope he proves me wrong and I&#039;ll be the first to jump on his wagon.  In order to do that I&#039;m going to need to see 2-3 years (in other words consistency) of winning, NFC North Championships, &amp; making the playoffs.  From what I saw last year we are headed for more years of mediocrity.  I&#039;m just not willing to wait another 30 years to get back to the Super Bowl.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will say that I am glad I am not a GM on an NFL team.  Way too many things to juggle for my feeble mind.  That being said, I also wish TT was not a GM in the NFL&#8212; for the same reason.</p>
<p>Now, I certainly hope he proves me wrong and I&#8217;ll be the first to jump on his wagon.  In order to do that I&#8217;m going to need to see 2-3 years (in other words consistency) of winning, NFC North Championships, &amp; making the playoffs.  From what I saw last year we are headed for more years of mediocrity.  I&#8217;m just not willing to wait another 30 years to get back to the Super Bowl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveK</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/03/25/thompson-thinks-packers-fine-as-they-are/#comment-5984</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DaveK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=2968#comment-5984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The rest are average to below average players that haven’t proved they’re worth a damn thing.&quot;

I guess I am just not as down on the roster as you are Ron. Pickett, Jolly, Bigby, Kampman, Chillar, and Colledge all MAY be worth a contract extension come mid-season if they do perform well.  I am not saying you don&#039;t partake in FA but to just dimiss a possible extension for all these guys seems pre-mature. You have to leave some room availible to extend at least a few of these guys IF needed. What if Kampman just thrives in the 3-4? You&#039;ll sure want the space to extend him a few years.  Same will Colledge who I think could become an above average starter this year.  You also need to look in locking in Williams if needed to replace Harris/Woodson down the road. 

Again, it comes down to how you view the roster. IF you think it is a big pile of steamy cr-p then of course you partake in FA to replace guys. But, if you think there are 3-4 guys on the roster that will thrive and need to be extended then you have to be fairly conservative in FA given how many guys are set to &#039;graduate&#039; after next season.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The rest are average to below average players that haven’t proved they’re worth a damn thing.&#8221;</p>
<p>I guess I am just not as down on the roster as you are Ron. Pickett, Jolly, Bigby, Kampman, Chillar, and Colledge all MAY be worth a contract extension come mid-season if they do perform well.  I am not saying you don&#8217;t partake in FA but to just dimiss a possible extension for all these guys seems pre-mature. You have to leave some room availible to extend at least a few of these guys IF needed. What if Kampman just thrives in the 3-4? You&#8217;ll sure want the space to extend him a few years.  Same will Colledge who I think could become an above average starter this year.  You also need to look in locking in Williams if needed to replace Harris/Woodson down the road. </p>
<p>Again, it comes down to how you view the roster. IF you think it is a big pile of steamy cr-p then of course you partake in FA to replace guys. But, if you think there are 3-4 guys on the roster that will thrive and need to be extended then you have to be fairly conservative in FA given how many guys are set to &#8216;graduate&#8217; after next season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aberceau</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/03/25/thompson-thinks-packers-fine-as-they-are/#comment-5979</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aberceau]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 08:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=2968#comment-5979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;A good general manager must use all avenues for improvement. Ron Wolf always did&quot;
This is a quote from Micheal Lombardi and couldn&#039;t be more true. Until we start exploring free agency and signing some players, we will be stuck in this state of mediocrity. Building through the draft is fine if you have the playmakers and veterans already in place, but when you need immediate impact like we do now this is inexcusable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A good general manager must use all avenues for improvement. Ron Wolf always did&#8221;<br />
This is a quote from Micheal Lombardi and couldn&#8217;t be more true. Until we start exploring free agency and signing some players, we will be stuck in this state of mediocrity. Building through the draft is fine if you have the playmakers and veterans already in place, but when you need immediate impact like we do now this is inexcusable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron La Canne</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/03/25/thompson-thinks-packers-fine-as-they-are/#comment-5978</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron La Canne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 02:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=2968#comment-5978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jennings and Collins (with some reservations) are the only two coming up that should be considered for early contracts.  The rest are average to below average players that haven&#039;t proved they&#039;re worth a damn thing.  College actually play a full year as a starter before you are considered for a contract extension.  Moll and Spitz give me a break.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jennings and Collins (with some reservations) are the only two coming up that should be considered for early contracts.  The rest are average to below average players that haven&#8217;t proved they&#8217;re worth a damn thing.  College actually play a full year as a starter before you are considered for a contract extension.  Moll and Spitz give me a break.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveK</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/03/25/thompson-thinks-packers-fine-as-they-are/#comment-5977</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DaveK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=2968#comment-5977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This was the key quote by Thompson in the article for me:

&quot;We&#039;re in a stage with our team that we&#039;re not going to have the luxury of having tons of room under the cap. We&#039;re at a stage where we have to start bringing our contracts up for some of the guys who are going to be &#039;graduating.&#039;&quot;

i.e.- I drafted so well that the Packers have a TON of really good players coming off their rookie contracts that need to get PAID.  Thompson obviously believes these players are better then what is available in free agency and for each player you sign in free agency you are essentially saying goodbye to one or two of the &#039;graduating&#039; players becuase you almost always have to slightly over-pay in FA.  I am guessing he has essentially allocated a certain $ figure to key &#039;graduating&#039; players he thinks he will want to extend.   It eats into that $29 million of available cap room pretty quick.  He is essentially making the decision that the talent he has on the team is more worthy of the cap allocation then guys available in free agency at the current FA market prices. Whether that determination is grounded in ego or good/bad talent evaluation remains to be seen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was the key quote by Thompson in the article for me:</p>
<p>&#8220;We&#8217;re in a stage with our team that we&#8217;re not going to have the luxury of having tons of room under the cap. We&#8217;re at a stage where we have to start bringing our contracts up for some of the guys who are going to be &#8216;graduating.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>i.e.- I drafted so well that the Packers have a TON of really good players coming off their rookie contracts that need to get PAID.  Thompson obviously believes these players are better then what is available in free agency and for each player you sign in free agency you are essentially saying goodbye to one or two of the &#8216;graduating&#8217; players becuase you almost always have to slightly over-pay in FA.  I am guessing he has essentially allocated a certain $ figure to key &#8216;graduating&#8217; players he thinks he will want to extend.   It eats into that $29 million of available cap room pretty quick.  He is essentially making the decision that the talent he has on the team is more worthy of the cap allocation then guys available in free agency at the current FA market prices. Whether that determination is grounded in ego or good/bad talent evaluation remains to be seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron La Canne</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/03/25/thompson-thinks-packers-fine-as-they-are/#comment-5976</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron La Canne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=2968#comment-5976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Micheal Lombardi says, &quot;TT is not doing his job.&quot;  I finally agree with him on something.  Injury update says Jenkins not on schedule with biceps injury.  Harrell is down to 12 bags of jelly bellies for lunch.  Clifton is on schedule with minor knee surgery (minor knee surgery at 30+ sounds like an oxymoron to me).  Barnett ahead of schedule (he better be playing the inside in the 3-4).  Bruno Giapet (on schedule).  And the Packers resign Montgomery - Oh fricking joy!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Micheal Lombardi says, &#8220;TT is not doing his job.&#8221;  I finally agree with him on something.  Injury update says Jenkins not on schedule with biceps injury.  Harrell is down to 12 bags of jelly bellies for lunch.  Clifton is on schedule with minor knee surgery (minor knee surgery at 30+ sounds like an oxymoron to me).  Barnett ahead of schedule (he better be playing the inside in the 3-4).  Bruno Giapet (on schedule).  And the Packers resign Montgomery &#8211; Oh fricking joy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MC</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2009/03/25/thompson-thinks-packers-fine-as-they-are/#comment-5975</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=2968#comment-5975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like Ted the Scout and Ted the Talent Evaluator, but Ted the GM and Ted the Leader are keeping this team in perennial 6-10/7-9 land. Barring some shocking turn of events, does anyone see the Packers doing better than 9-7 (best case scenario) in 2009?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Ted the Scout and Ted the Talent Evaluator, but Ted the GM and Ted the Leader are keeping this team in perennial 6-10/7-9 land. Barring some shocking turn of events, does anyone see the Packers doing better than 9-7 (best case scenario) in 2009?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
