<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bob McGinn, you da man, Poppinga&#8217;s not</title>
	<atom:link href="http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/12/13/bob-mcginn-you-da-man-poppingas-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/12/13/bob-mcginn-you-da-man-poppingas-not/</link>
	<description>All Things Green Bay Packers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 23:13:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron La Canne</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/12/13/bob-mcginn-you-da-man-poppingas-not/#comment-5165</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron La Canne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=2564#comment-5165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andy,

An extension of my not so tounge-in-cheek critique of the LB&#039;s (extension of the D-Line review).  From the end of last season to the beginning of training camp, something went terribly wrong with the LB&#039;s.

Linebackers

Hawk -   Started the year outside and now in the middle.  I was one who thought he should be in the middle regardless of Barnett’’s status.  So, far he has not performed anywhere near the level expected.  Of course, neither did Barnett.  AJ is 1. injured,, 2. Not an impact player, or 3. being miss managed by the coaches.  Rating – Halfway between OK and Poor

Poppinga – Given a fat contract extension apparently the coaches thought he was a key to Linebacker play in 2008.    His overall play has been poor.  Using him as a rush lineman elicited more laughs than sacks.  His coverage of Vonte Leach exemplified just how bad he plays his position.  Rating – Poor

Havner - Who?  If I have to go into the Packer Web Site to determine just what he has done, I must rate him accordingly.  Rating - Stinks 

Chillar – Has played sporadically.  Has shown some potential, but has not been consistent enough to grade out at a higher level.  Rating – Halfway between OK and Poor

Bishop – A monument to inconsistency!  Has shown signs of almost brilliance and then counters it by blowing a game with a stupid mistake.  He is responsible for two late game losses with errors.  Rating – Poor (This could change with experience – he does show potential)

Lansanah – Occupying a slot because someone showed interest him while on practice squad.  If he is that important why in the hell can’t they figure out how to get him in the line-up.  It ain’t like they’ve got four All-Pros playing ahead of him.  Rating – Stinks

Let’s remember when Barnett left the lineup; his level of play was in the Poor to Stink range.  The Packers went into the year with a group of LB’s that were considered a strength of the team.  Right now they have to be considered a glaring weakness.  Based on last year’s performance, the coaching staff has got to be called on to answer for the performance levels.  Just what caused the precipitous decline in performance at these critical positions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy,</p>
<p>An extension of my not so tounge-in-cheek critique of the LB&#8217;s (extension of the D-Line review).  From the end of last season to the beginning of training camp, something went terribly wrong with the LB&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Linebackers</p>
<p>Hawk &#8211;   Started the year outside and now in the middle.  I was one who thought he should be in the middle regardless of Barnett’’s status.  So, far he has not performed anywhere near the level expected.  Of course, neither did Barnett.  AJ is 1. injured,, 2. Not an impact player, or 3. being miss managed by the coaches.  Rating – Halfway between OK and Poor</p>
<p>Poppinga – Given a fat contract extension apparently the coaches thought he was a key to Linebacker play in 2008.    His overall play has been poor.  Using him as a rush lineman elicited more laughs than sacks.  His coverage of Vonte Leach exemplified just how bad he plays his position.  Rating – Poor</p>
<p>Havner &#8211; Who?  If I have to go into the Packer Web Site to determine just what he has done, I must rate him accordingly.  Rating &#8211; Stinks </p>
<p>Chillar – Has played sporadically.  Has shown some potential, but has not been consistent enough to grade out at a higher level.  Rating – Halfway between OK and Poor</p>
<p>Bishop – A monument to inconsistency!  Has shown signs of almost brilliance and then counters it by blowing a game with a stupid mistake.  He is responsible for two late game losses with errors.  Rating – Poor (This could change with experience – he does show potential)</p>
<p>Lansanah – Occupying a slot because someone showed interest him while on practice squad.  If he is that important why in the hell can’t they figure out how to get him in the line-up.  It ain’t like they’ve got four All-Pros playing ahead of him.  Rating – Stinks</p>
<p>Let’s remember when Barnett left the lineup; his level of play was in the Poor to Stink range.  The Packers went into the year with a group of LB’s that were considered a strength of the team.  Right now they have to be considered a glaring weakness.  Based on last year’s performance, the coaching staff has got to be called on to answer for the performance levels.  Just what caused the precipitous decline in performance at these critical positions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trav</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/12/13/bob-mcginn-you-da-man-poppingas-not/#comment-5164</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trav]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=2564#comment-5164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Totally agree and think McGinn might have an RSS feed of your posts for his article ideas.  When I saw the title, I was expecting McGinn to unload with both barrels.  I do agree that there is something to be said for the quality of a person, given the relative &quot;thuggery&quot; of pro sports in general.  Effort and attitude can get you pretty far, but eventually the physical shortcomings get exposed and we get to where we are now with a highly paid special teams player, at best.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree and think McGinn might have an RSS feed of your posts for his article ideas.  When I saw the title, I was expecting McGinn to unload with both barrels.  I do agree that there is something to be said for the quality of a person, given the relative &#8220;thuggery&#8221; of pro sports in general.  Effort and attitude can get you pretty far, but eventually the physical shortcomings get exposed and we get to where we are now with a highly paid special teams player, at best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awhayes</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/12/13/bob-mcginn-you-da-man-poppingas-not/#comment-5163</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[awhayes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=2564#comment-5163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trav - just saw your comment after putting this up. You&#039;re right - it wasn&#039;t as harsh as it could have been or should have been - I think that has to do with Brady being a good guy and McGinn maybe not wanting to completely tear him down. Though it at least calls him out for weak performance and the quotes from the AFC scout were pretty telling to me - other teams recognize that he struggles and is slower. But the important thing is that Poppinga has largely escaped criticism and finally McGinn is at least bringing it up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trav &#8211; just saw your comment after putting this up. You&#8217;re right &#8211; it wasn&#8217;t as harsh as it could have been or should have been &#8211; I think that has to do with Brady being a good guy and McGinn maybe not wanting to completely tear him down. Though it at least calls him out for weak performance and the quotes from the AFC scout were pretty telling to me &#8211; other teams recognize that he struggles and is slower. But the important thing is that Poppinga has largely escaped criticism and finally McGinn is at least bringing it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
