<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2008 Week 9 picks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/10/30/2008-week-9-picks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/10/30/2008-week-9-picks/</link>
	<description>All Things Green Bay Packers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 08:09:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: joshywoshybigfatposhy</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/10/30/2008-week-9-picks/#comment-4566</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joshywoshybigfatposhy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 05:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=2168#comment-4566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i have to agree on Arizona.  i think st. louis could handle hightower alone, but not hightower, tackleberry, mahoney and jonesey all at the same time - they just don&#039;t match up.  that band of misfits always seems to end up on top, and i don&#039;t see harris getting his way anytime soon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have to agree on Arizona.  i think st. louis could handle hightower alone, but not hightower, tackleberry, mahoney and jonesey all at the same time &#8211; they just don&#8217;t match up.  that band of misfits always seems to end up on top, and i don&#8217;t see harris getting his way anytime soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave in Tucson</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/10/30/2008-week-9-picks/#comment-4565</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave in Tucson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=2168#comment-4565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Cardinals -2.5?  St. Louis has the Arch, but the Cardinals have Warner, Fitzgerald, Boldin, and Hightower.  Unless Leinart plays, the Cards should cover easily.

NE @ Indy -- Manning may be whining, but Brady is in LA hoping they don&#039;t have to cut on his knee &lt;em&gt;again&lt;/em&gt;.  The Pats have 5 wins on 5 cupcakes.  The Colts are not as good as they were last year, but the Patriots have fallen off a cliff.  It may not be by much, but I think IND can cover 5.5.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Cardinals -2.5?  St. Louis has the Arch, but the Cardinals have Warner, Fitzgerald, Boldin, and Hightower.  Unless Leinart plays, the Cards should cover easily.</p>
<p>NE @ Indy &#8212; Manning may be whining, but Brady is in LA hoping they don&#8217;t have to cut on his knee <em>again</em>.  The Pats have 5 wins on 5 cupcakes.  The Colts are not as good as they were last year, but the Patriots have fallen off a cliff.  It may not be by much, but I think IND can cover 5.5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
