Comments on: ESPN weighs in on Favre – sort of http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/10/21/espn-weighs-in-on-favre-sort-of/ All Things Green Bay Packers Tue, 21 May 2013 08:09:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: scott in wisconsin http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/10/21/espn-weighs-in-on-favre-sort-of/#comment-4434 Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:35:59 +0000 http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=2102#comment-4434 Favre has admitted that he can remember EVERY play he’s ever been in since high school. All of a sudden he can’t remember much? Pah. It smells.

]]> By: Donald's Designated Driver http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/10/21/espn-weighs-in-on-favre-sort-of/#comment-4432 Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:55:45 +0000 http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=2102#comment-4432 Favre admitted the story today:

http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/10/22/favre-admits-to-strategy-session-with-millen/

]]> By: Donald's Designated Driver http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/10/21/espn-weighs-in-on-favre-sort-of/#comment-4433 Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:53:46 +0000 http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=2102#comment-4433 Favre admitted the story today:

http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/10/22/favre-admits-to-strategy-session-with-millen/

]]> By: scott in wisconsin http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/10/21/espn-weighs-in-on-favre-sort-of/#comment-4423 Tue, 21 Oct 2008 23:48:17 +0000 http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=2102#comment-4423 ESPN. ENTERTAINMENT sports network. It’s not JOURNALISM sports network. For the most part, they are the Entertainment Tonight of Sports television. Toss softballs for questions and rub the egos of the celebrities interviewed for meaningless segments. The only decent show on ESPN is “Outside the Lines” and that is given such a small budget and a such a horrible tine slot, it’s obvious what their priorities are.

]]> By: Joe http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/10/21/espn-weighs-in-on-favre-sort-of/#comment-4421 Tue, 21 Oct 2008 22:04:04 +0000 http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=2102#comment-4421 Who is their reliable source? I wonder, hmm. Who do we know that constently tells ESPN stories are total B.S. even when their true?

]]>