Catching up on the Ryan and Hodge news

by

The Ryan cut could be problematic for Mason Crosby as holders are an underrated part of the game. Kickers develop a certain feel for the guy holding. Now, Crosby may not whine about the whole thing as much as Longwell did when he lost his holder, but I worry this may affect more than just the punting. Ryan was a reliable holder and importantly, he and Crosby had the standard kicker bond.

As far as punting, Ryan was not terribly consistent, true, but this is a surprising move because Frost hasn’t distinguished himself. I’ll hold off on total judgment to see first if Frost can deliver, but I have to agree with Brother Steve when it comes to feeling bad for a quality guy getting let go. My guess is tha this is not a popular move in the locker room. For a guy who probably felt like he had the job in the bag since the start of training camp when he learned no competition would be brought in, this is actually quite brutal. And, he didn’t have a bad preseason. With a few exceptions, his punting I thought was quite good (a couple 50+ yarders backed us out from deep in our territory).

The Abdul Hodge cut doesn’t make sense to me. I understand why White would remain on the team because he is wild and effective on special teams. I like keeping him. But I think finding another player to cut would have been advisable considering Hodge’s upside. As Aaron pointed out, Hodge played most of his time as a back-up middle linebacker – just like Desmond Bishop. I (and many other Packergeek readers) have wondered on several occasions why Hodge and Bishop haven’t seen more time at the strong and weak side LB positions until recently (Bishop had played some at back-up strong side a few times in the preseason.) The philosophy of the team, that we hear every time the O-Line gets shuffled around, is that every player at a certain position should have some understanding for the other similar positions (for example tackles should work some at guard just in case of injuries etc). It is a sensible philosophy, but it begs the question: why didn’t Hodge ever get work at the other LB positions? Perhaps he did in practice and sucked – I’ll allow for that possibility (but I never did see it in a game). It’s also possible he wasn’t given a fair shake at backing up Poppinga or Hawk and now we face the possibility of losing a player who could very well go on to excel for someone else.

About these ads

4 Responses to “Catching up on the Ryan and Hodge news”

  1. Trav Says:

    Andy – The holder piece is what worries me most. Crosby having to break in a new holder in less than a week is a bit scary to say the least. The bond you referred to and the familiarity of the holder with the kicker are the keys. I equate it to the same relationship that a center/QB or a WR/QB would have. If they are not on the same page, things can go horribly wrong. Things like PATs or FG’s within 30 yards are generally automatic, but now add in this dynamic and there is the potential for added drama (in a season that has all too much already…).

  2. Aaron Rogders Says:

    Maybe they saved a few bucks by getting rid of Ryan and putting in a new guy…

  3. mike R Says:

    cutting Hodge and Keeping Bush ? What the F— ! is going on up there..Was Hodge a problem,to dull to get the passing game. ect,ect WHAT!!!!!! I can hardly believe it… Ryan will be missed. The Redskins drafted a punter for a reason…

  4. Mac G Says:

    Hodge is a tackling machine and he was finally healthy. J Bush is simply a terrible professional football player.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: