<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2nd half recap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/08/23/2nd-half-recap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/08/23/2nd-half-recap/</link>
	<description>All Things Green Bay Packers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 08:09:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott in wisconsin</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/08/23/2nd-half-recap/#comment-3293</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scott in wisconsin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 00:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=1526#comment-3293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080823/GPG0603/808230605/1271/GPG06


Interesting angle on the whole BF thing from the Press Gazette...one that I&#039;ve not seen anywhere else.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080823/GPG0603/808230605/1271/GPG06" rel="nofollow">http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080823/GPG0603/808230605/1271/GPG06</a></p>
<p>Interesting angle on the whole BF thing from the Press Gazette&#8230;one that I&#8217;ve not seen anywhere else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RayMidge</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/08/23/2nd-half-recap/#comment-3290</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RayMidge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 16:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=1526#comment-3290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lumpkin made a believer out of me.  He is tenacious and I like the SEC pedigree. I think Morency goes.  Herron might be a solid late bloomer.

The word that keeps coming up in my head about Brohm is &quot;skittish&quot;.  Not an inspiring quality at this level.  Flynn&#039;s comparative cool is why I think a lot of us feel he&#039;s a better bet to actually become a successful NFL QB.  Guys with better talent than Brohm have crapped out because they just didn&#039;t have the innate clock that you need and which is, fairly or unfairly, parcelled out unevenly at birth.  It&#039;s still early but I don&#039;t have much hope in Brohm.    

Rodgers looked great.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lumpkin made a believer out of me.  He is tenacious and I like the SEC pedigree. I think Morency goes.  Herron might be a solid late bloomer.</p>
<p>The word that keeps coming up in my head about Brohm is &#8220;skittish&#8221;.  Not an inspiring quality at this level.  Flynn&#8217;s comparative cool is why I think a lot of us feel he&#8217;s a better bet to actually become a successful NFL QB.  Guys with better talent than Brohm have crapped out because they just didn&#8217;t have the innate clock that you need and which is, fairly or unfairly, parcelled out unevenly at birth.  It&#8217;s still early but I don&#8217;t have much hope in Brohm.    </p>
<p>Rodgers looked great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron La Canne</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/08/23/2nd-half-recap/#comment-3289</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron La Canne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 15:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=1526#comment-3289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[QB - Grade A  Rodgers played in control.  On target all night.  Brohm needs work, not ready to step in.  Flynn - Looks ok.  Better than Brohm at this point.

RB - Grade B  Jackson had some good effort runs.  Also did something with a screen.  Herron didn&#039;t hurt himself - solid.  Lumpkin - played tough and quick.  Starting to think he may make the team.  Morency was inconsistent and looked a little tentative.

OL - Grade C  Overall, much better than last week.  Still not making the running game any easier.

Rec - Grade B+  Good to see Jennings back on the field.  Only drop was Jones.

DL  Grade F  I can&#039;t believe that the group thought to be a team strength has deteriorated to this level.  Absolutely no pass rush (no blitzing doesn&#039;t help), point of first contact was 3 to 5 yards off the Line of scrimage, and NO tackling just reaching.  Some of the backups looked good against Denver&#039;s scrubs.

LB  Grade C  Too many missed tackles.  We sure do miss AJ.  Barnett had a bad game, but he will recover.  Chillar, I&#039;m not convinced yet.  They shokuld be trying Hodge and Bishop on the outside.

DB  Grade C  Too many mistakes on the corner.  Play was inconsistent.  Bigby and Collins injuries could be a new probelm.  Let&#039;s hope not.  Williams has potential but is not ready for one on one coverage.  Does Harris look slow to anyone else?

ST Grade B+  Ryan likes the light air.  Not sure, but I heard his Gross was 70 yards and net was 49+.  Mason pushed the 53 yarder to the right.  Most kickoffs not returnable

Overall, still not ready for prime time.  Especially the defensive line.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>QB &#8211; Grade A  Rodgers played in control.  On target all night.  Brohm needs work, not ready to step in.  Flynn &#8211; Looks ok.  Better than Brohm at this point.</p>
<p>RB &#8211; Grade B  Jackson had some good effort runs.  Also did something with a screen.  Herron didn&#8217;t hurt himself &#8211; solid.  Lumpkin &#8211; played tough and quick.  Starting to think he may make the team.  Morency was inconsistent and looked a little tentative.</p>
<p>OL &#8211; Grade C  Overall, much better than last week.  Still not making the running game any easier.</p>
<p>Rec &#8211; Grade B+  Good to see Jennings back on the field.  Only drop was Jones.</p>
<p>DL  Grade F  I can&#8217;t believe that the group thought to be a team strength has deteriorated to this level.  Absolutely no pass rush (no blitzing doesn&#8217;t help), point of first contact was 3 to 5 yards off the Line of scrimage, and NO tackling just reaching.  Some of the backups looked good against Denver&#8217;s scrubs.</p>
<p>LB  Grade C  Too many missed tackles.  We sure do miss AJ.  Barnett had a bad game, but he will recover.  Chillar, I&#8217;m not convinced yet.  They shokuld be trying Hodge and Bishop on the outside.</p>
<p>DB  Grade C  Too many mistakes on the corner.  Play was inconsistent.  Bigby and Collins injuries could be a new probelm.  Let&#8217;s hope not.  Williams has potential but is not ready for one on one coverage.  Does Harris look slow to anyone else?</p>
<p>ST Grade B+  Ryan likes the light air.  Not sure, but I heard his Gross was 70 yards and net was 49+.  Mason pushed the 53 yarder to the right.  Most kickoffs not returnable</p>
<p>Overall, still not ready for prime time.  Especially the defensive line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy V</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/08/23/2nd-half-recap/#comment-3288</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cindy V]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 15:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=1526#comment-3288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was a bit concerned about the defense.  They didn&#039;t stop the Broncos during much of the first half.  I know some of our first team regulars weren&#039;t out there.  Still, they need to stop the run, tackle better, and cover the receivers more.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was a bit concerned about the defense.  They didn&#8217;t stop the Broncos during much of the first half.  I know some of our first team regulars weren&#8217;t out there.  Still, they need to stop the run, tackle better, and cover the receivers more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott in wisconsin</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/08/23/2nd-half-recap/#comment-3286</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scott in wisconsin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=1526#comment-3286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brohm did look OK. I look forward to the last preseason game to see what he can REALLY do. I still like Flynn though. He looks like he has fun out there and scans the field a bit quicker than Brohm... sorta like ol&#039; Brett did. I guess it&#039;s like when you&#039;ve had a family dog that dies and you get another one, you look for traits that the old one had. I&#039;m doin&#039; that with only Flynn for some reason.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brohm did look OK. I look forward to the last preseason game to see what he can REALLY do. I still like Flynn though. He looks like he has fun out there and scans the field a bit quicker than Brohm&#8230; sorta like ol&#8217; Brett did. I guess it&#8217;s like when you&#8217;ve had a family dog that dies and you get another one, you look for traits that the old one had. I&#8217;m doin&#8217; that with only Flynn for some reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
