<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Favre, Grant, Packer tidbits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/07/28/favre-grant-packer-tidbits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/07/28/favre-grant-packer-tidbits/</link>
	<description>All Things Green Bay Packers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 08:09:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron La Canne</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/07/28/favre-grant-packer-tidbits/#comment-2369</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron La Canne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=1053#comment-2369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That would be ideal,  Andy.  Wynn and Grant are both quick to the line, commit to the hole well (take advantage of zone blocking) and can turn on the quickness and power for positive yards.

Can&#039;t understand the Packers position on Grant.  If they offer $4 million in guarenteed money (maybe they can spread it over more than one year - not sure what the rules are concerning the Cap) and a longer term contract heavily insentive based there would be a deal.  I think that would be a bargin.  The only way that&#039;s not a bargin is if Grant takes the money and sits on his butt.  I don&#039;t see that in this kid.  He&#039;s a player - Sign him now.

Russ Ball is an IDIOT!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would be ideal,  Andy.  Wynn and Grant are both quick to the line, commit to the hole well (take advantage of zone blocking) and can turn on the quickness and power for positive yards.</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t understand the Packers position on Grant.  If they offer $4 million in guarenteed money (maybe they can spread it over more than one year &#8211; not sure what the rules are concerning the Cap) and a longer term contract heavily insentive based there would be a deal.  I think that would be a bargin.  The only way that&#8217;s not a bargin is if Grant takes the money and sits on his butt.  I don&#8217;t see that in this kid.  He&#8217;s a player &#8211; Sign him now.</p>
<p>Russ Ball is an IDIOT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awhayes</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/07/28/favre-grant-packer-tidbits/#comment-2368</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[awhayes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=1053#comment-2368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting Wynn tidbit. I actually would put Wynn #2 (or I suppose #1 presently) on the RB depth chart. He is the most talented of the running backs and I think people will be surprised this year by how good this guy really is after learning the offense. I still can&#039;t imagine how the starting RB from a national championship team dropped to the 7th round. Wynn will be good but he&#039;ll be much better platooning in with Grant than as the featured back. He and Grant will offer a really good change of style that will cause problems for defenses. Jackson may become the 3rd down back as I&#039;m not sure Morency will make the team.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting Wynn tidbit. I actually would put Wynn #2 (or I suppose #1 presently) on the RB depth chart. He is the most talented of the running backs and I think people will be surprised this year by how good this guy really is after learning the offense. I still can&#8217;t imagine how the starting RB from a national championship team dropped to the 7th round. Wynn will be good but he&#8217;ll be much better platooning in with Grant than as the featured back. He and Grant will offer a really good change of style that will cause problems for defenses. Jackson may become the 3rd down back as I&#8217;m not sure Morency will make the team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron La Canne</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/07/28/favre-grant-packer-tidbits/#comment-2359</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron La Canne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=1053#comment-2359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mc Carthy (last question at his press conference today)

Q:  How was DeShawn Wynn&#039;s offseason?

A:  Very good.  I think he&#039;s done an exemplary job in the weight room.  Very powerful, gifted young man.  He&#039;s another one I look forward to step up and take advantage of the opportunity he&#039;s going to get.

Opportunity he&#039;s going to be given?  Interesting/disturbing comment by the coach.  If I look at the RB depth chart, I would guess Wynn is four behing Grant, Jackson, and Morency.  Is he telling us something about the Grant situation?  No, I don&#039;t believe in Allien abduction.

I&#039;m affraid they&#039;ve given Russ Ball the &quot;Grant Project&quot; as his OJT.  I&#039;m affraid this may not come to a happy conclusion.  By the way have I ever said that I think Russ Ball is an IDIOT?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mc Carthy (last question at his press conference today)</p>
<p>Q:  How was DeShawn Wynn&#8217;s offseason?</p>
<p>A:  Very good.  I think he&#8217;s done an exemplary job in the weight room.  Very powerful, gifted young man.  He&#8217;s another one I look forward to step up and take advantage of the opportunity he&#8217;s going to get.</p>
<p>Opportunity he&#8217;s going to be given?  Interesting/disturbing comment by the coach.  If I look at the RB depth chart, I would guess Wynn is four behing Grant, Jackson, and Morency.  Is he telling us something about the Grant situation?  No, I don&#8217;t believe in Allien abduction.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m affraid they&#8217;ve given Russ Ball the &#8220;Grant Project&#8221; as his OJT.  I&#8217;m affraid this may not come to a happy conclusion.  By the way have I ever said that I think Russ Ball is an IDIOT?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PackerBelle</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/07/28/favre-grant-packer-tidbits/#comment-2350</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PackerBelle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=1053#comment-2350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think the Packers really object to the incentive based deal, I would bet the desired $5 million signing bonus is probably a bigger issue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the Packers really object to the incentive based deal, I would bet the desired $5 million signing bonus is probably a bigger issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/07/28/favre-grant-packer-tidbits/#comment-2343</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=1053#comment-2343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been critical of Ryan Grant&#039;s overplaying of his leverage but if he is willing to do an incentive based deal the Pack should take it in a heartbeat.  Nobody loses, it is the mother of all merit based pay.  How can the GM be criticized for a incentive deal.  And the player can’t complain because all he has to do is prove what he has been saying about his skill is true.  The only possible loser is the agent and who gives a rat’s ass about agents?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been critical of Ryan Grant&#8217;s overplaying of his leverage but if he is willing to do an incentive based deal the Pack should take it in a heartbeat.  Nobody loses, it is the mother of all merit based pay.  How can the GM be criticized for a incentive deal.  And the player can’t complain because all he has to do is prove what he has been saying about his skill is true.  The only possible loser is the agent and who gives a rat’s ass about agents?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron La Canne</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/07/28/favre-grant-packer-tidbits/#comment-2342</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron La Canne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=1053#comment-2342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Furst two qyestions to Mc Carthy (Rhnx to Packers.com)

(Why was Ryan Pickett limited today?) 
Ryan Pickett has a slight hamstring strain. It happened last week working out, so we&#039;re just, as I always say, being smart. 

(Will either Pickett or Justin Harrell be on the PUP list?) 
Oh, no. They are going to be...I think their situations are both in the, I would say Ryan is more day-to-day and Justin would be week-to week. 

I&#039;m getting nervous with this, not paniced yet but nervous.

The Favre Comments:

(Were you taken aback by the bitter tone of some of Brett&#039;s comments?) 
I&#039;ll just say this; I spoke about it some on Saturday. Brett Favre and I didn&#039;t agree on things, whether it was the game plan and this and that. I don&#039;t agree with what was in quotes. I couldn&#039;t see Ted Thompson making those statements, but I&#039;m not going to sit here and referee articles and interviews. That&#039;s not my place, that&#039;s not my focus. It&#039;s something that has gone on. We&#039;re all in this position and we&#039;re all dealing with it the best we can and staying on the high road. 

(Would he be doing this team a disservice by showing up at camp and creating a distraction?) I don&#039;t view it that way. It&#039;s an option. Once again, this is a very unusual situation that we&#039;re in. It really falls under the terms of a business decision. Those are one of his options. We have a very strong locker room. I have great confidence in our players. If you look at the makeup of our locker room, 25 percent, 21 players, have never even met Brett Favre. There are a lot of things that we talked about, I wouldn&#039;t say a lot of things. We talked about it as a team yesterday. I don&#039;t foresee Brett Favre coming in here as a problem. Brett Favre is a big part of the Green Bay Packers history, and he may be a part of the future as we move forward, and that&#039;s an option that he has if he reinstates. 


I don&#039;t think Mc Carthy said much about Favre in the future.  Just pc hold your tounge stuff.

The entire transcripy is here:

http://www.packers.com/news/releases/2008/07/28/1/printable/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Furst two qyestions to Mc Carthy (Rhnx to Packers.com)</p>
<p>(Why was Ryan Pickett limited today?)<br />
Ryan Pickett has a slight hamstring strain. It happened last week working out, so we&#8217;re just, as I always say, being smart. </p>
<p>(Will either Pickett or Justin Harrell be on the PUP list?)<br />
Oh, no. They are going to be&#8230;I think their situations are both in the, I would say Ryan is more day-to-day and Justin would be week-to week. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m getting nervous with this, not paniced yet but nervous.</p>
<p>The Favre Comments:</p>
<p>(Were you taken aback by the bitter tone of some of Brett&#8217;s comments?)<br />
I&#8217;ll just say this; I spoke about it some on Saturday. Brett Favre and I didn&#8217;t agree on things, whether it was the game plan and this and that. I don&#8217;t agree with what was in quotes. I couldn&#8217;t see Ted Thompson making those statements, but I&#8217;m not going to sit here and referee articles and interviews. That&#8217;s not my place, that&#8217;s not my focus. It&#8217;s something that has gone on. We&#8217;re all in this position and we&#8217;re all dealing with it the best we can and staying on the high road. </p>
<p>(Would he be doing this team a disservice by showing up at camp and creating a distraction?) I don&#8217;t view it that way. It&#8217;s an option. Once again, this is a very unusual situation that we&#8217;re in. It really falls under the terms of a business decision. Those are one of his options. We have a very strong locker room. I have great confidence in our players. If you look at the makeup of our locker room, 25 percent, 21 players, have never even met Brett Favre. There are a lot of things that we talked about, I wouldn&#8217;t say a lot of things. We talked about it as a team yesterday. I don&#8217;t foresee Brett Favre coming in here as a problem. Brett Favre is a big part of the Green Bay Packers history, and he may be a part of the future as we move forward, and that&#8217;s an option that he has if he reinstates. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think Mc Carthy said much about Favre in the future.  Just pc hold your tounge stuff.</p>
<p>The entire transcripy is here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.packers.com/news/releases/2008/07/28/1/printable/" rel="nofollow">http://www.packers.com/news/releases/2008/07/28/1/printable/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Favrefan4ever</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/07/28/favre-grant-packer-tidbits/#comment-2341</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Favrefan4ever]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=1053#comment-2341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The &quot;thumbs up, thumbs down&quot; report is not surprising. Just ask the Packer players what they are thinking of all of this. Sure, when asked by reporters they will all say the right things. But when asked face to face, they will tell you the truth: They want to win. They do not care about egos, do not care about age of players, do not even care much about the future. They will tell you they what to win and they all know that Brett Favre gives them the best chance to win. Just ask them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;thumbs up, thumbs down&#8221; report is not surprising. Just ask the Packer players what they are thinking of all of this. Sure, when asked by reporters they will all say the right things. But when asked face to face, they will tell you the truth: They want to win. They do not care about egos, do not care about age of players, do not even care much about the future. They will tell you they what to win and they all know that Brett Favre gives them the best chance to win. Just ask them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron La Canne</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/07/28/favre-grant-packer-tidbits/#comment-2338</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron La Canne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=1053#comment-2338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes that was deliberate! &quot;bruch&quot;  No that wasn&#039;t deliberate &quot;couse&quot; and a instead of are.  My only excuse are my arthretic hands.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes that was deliberate! &#8220;bruch&#8221;  No that wasn&#8217;t deliberate &#8220;couse&#8221; and a instead of are.  My only excuse are my arthretic hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron La Canne</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/07/28/favre-grant-packer-tidbits/#comment-2337</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron La Canne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=1053#comment-2337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow - I need to bruch up on my typing and spelling skills.

Andy has nailed both issues.  It is time to move on.  Provided. of couse, the Vilings a forced to give outragious compensation.  Grant deserves at least 3 million (Poppinga value).

Russ Hall is an idiot!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow &#8211; I need to bruch up on my typing and spelling skills.</p>
<p>Andy has nailed both issues.  It is time to move on.  Provided. of couse, the Vilings a forced to give outragious compensation.  Grant deserves at least 3 million (Poppinga value).</p>
<p>Russ Hall is an idiot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sfhayes</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/07/28/favre-grant-packer-tidbits/#comment-2333</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sfhayes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 15:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=1053#comment-2333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[no kidding, bill w. probably knew that off the top of his head.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no kidding, bill w. probably knew that off the top of his head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
