<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Could Rodgers be&#8230;.more effective than the recent Favre?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/06/04/could-rodgers-bemore-effective-than-the-recent-favre/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/06/04/could-rodgers-bemore-effective-than-the-recent-favre/</link>
	<description>All Things Green Bay Packers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 23:13:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interesting article on Favre/Rodgers &#171; packergeeks</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/06/04/could-rodgers-bemore-effective-than-the-recent-favre/#comment-15581</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Interesting article on Favre/Rodgers &#171; packergeeks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 16:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=797#comment-15581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of you may recall a post I put up a few years ago after Favre retired (the 2008 retirement). I&#8217;ll admit after [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of you may recall a post I put up a few years ago after Favre retired (the 2008 retirement). I&#8217;ll admit after [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awhayes</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/06/04/could-rodgers-bemore-effective-than-the-recent-favre/#comment-1790</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[awhayes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 16:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=797#comment-1790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks fellas - Joe, my choice was flirting with the jinx rule or being negative man. Actually, I have to admit, I&#039;m a bit surprised by how much positive press there has been for Rodgers so far. I suppose he hasn&#039;t done anything yet to make people too worried he&#039;ll be terrible, but still, I haven&#039;t read many takes stating he&#039;ll be awful.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks fellas &#8211; Joe, my choice was flirting with the jinx rule or being negative man. Actually, I have to admit, I&#8217;m a bit surprised by how much positive press there has been for Rodgers so far. I suppose he hasn&#8217;t done anything yet to make people too worried he&#8217;ll be terrible, but still, I haven&#8217;t read many takes stating he&#8217;ll be awful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/06/04/could-rodgers-bemore-effective-than-the-recent-favre/#comment-1789</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 16:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=797#comment-1789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you may be correct - but what ever happened to the jinx rule?  Stop saying he&#039;ll be good - you&#039;re gonna jinx it!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you may be correct &#8211; but what ever happened to the jinx rule?  Stop saying he&#8217;ll be good &#8211; you&#8217;re gonna jinx it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeks Bullish On Rodgers &#124; Cheesehead TV</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/06/04/could-rodgers-bemore-effective-than-the-recent-favre/#comment-1781</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geeks Bullish On Rodgers &#124; Cheesehead TV]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 19:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=797#comment-1781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] had my differences with both Andy and Steve over at PackerGeeks, but I wholeheartedly embrace this War and Peace-like in length post by Andy where our intrepid Geek brother muses on the (not-so-far-fetched in my opinion) possibility [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] had my differences with both Andy and Steve over at PackerGeeks, but I wholeheartedly embrace this War and Peace-like in length post by Andy where our intrepid Geek brother muses on the (not-so-far-fetched in my opinion) possibility [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
