<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aaron Rodgers &#8212; Ready to Play</title>
	<atom:link href="http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/02/21/aaron-rodgers-ready-to-play/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/02/21/aaron-rodgers-ready-to-play/</link>
	<description>All Things Green Bay Packers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 23:13:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RayMidge</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/02/21/aaron-rodgers-ready-to-play/#comment-717</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RayMidge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/?p=559#comment-717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He&#039;s got all of the tools, he&#039;s been given the advantage of experiencing what used to be the traditional grooming/learning period for a young QB and he has shown marked improvement over the past few pre-seasons and we saw in Dallas that it was no fluke.  But the dustbin is full of guys who matched that description and simply didn&#039;t have the intangibles, the make-up, whatever you want to call it, to be the QB of a successful team.  We can never know until they are put in the position with no safety net.  I don&#039;t think he&#039;s the next dynamic, great QB in the league (that&#039;s Philly&#039;s Kevin Kolb in my opinion), but he certainly can be an above average director of this offense . . . if he has the ability to stay in there.  

But no amount of optimism about Rodgers&#039; future prospects argues in favor of finding out any sooner than we have to.  let&#039;s get #4 back for at least one more go round.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s got all of the tools, he&#8217;s been given the advantage of experiencing what used to be the traditional grooming/learning period for a young QB and he has shown marked improvement over the past few pre-seasons and we saw in Dallas that it was no fluke.  But the dustbin is full of guys who matched that description and simply didn&#8217;t have the intangibles, the make-up, whatever you want to call it, to be the QB of a successful team.  We can never know until they are put in the position with no safety net.  I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;s the next dynamic, great QB in the league (that&#8217;s Philly&#8217;s Kevin Kolb in my opinion), but he certainly can be an above average director of this offense . . . if he has the ability to stay in there.  </p>
<p>But no amount of optimism about Rodgers&#8217; future prospects argues in favor of finding out any sooner than we have to.  let&#8217;s get #4 back for at least one more go round.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
