<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some Perspective on Favre, Please</title>
	<atom:link href="http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/01/21/some-perspective-on-favre-please/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/01/21/some-perspective-on-favre-please/</link>
	<description>All Things Green Bay Packers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 08:09:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lostinutah</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/01/21/some-perspective-on-favre-please/#comment-482</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lostinutah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 03:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/01/21/some-perspective-on-favre-please/#comment-482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Um, I don&#039;t.  At least for another year.  Deanna, Britt and Breleigh, please share Brett with us one more year.  Please.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, I don&#8217;t.  At least for another year.  Deanna, Britt and Breleigh, please share Brett with us one more year.  Please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Packer Fans, Unhinged &#171; packergeeks</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/01/21/some-perspective-on-favre-please/#comment-467</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Packer Fans, Unhinged &#171; packergeeks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 02:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/01/21/some-perspective-on-favre-please/#comment-467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] it was. It was for people like this that I decided to make the basic points about Favre that I made here. I won&#8217;t waste your time by reprinting here all of his feculent nonsense, but check out these [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it was. It was for people like this that I decided to make the basic points about Favre that I made here. I won&#8217;t waste your time by reprinting here all of his feculent nonsense, but check out these [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Donoghue</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/01/21/some-perspective-on-favre-please/#comment-466</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Donoghue]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 01:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/01/21/some-perspective-on-favre-please/#comment-466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After watching the game and being completely shattered!!! I have spent the last few hours pondering the season that we had. Yes we lost in the the worst way, at home and in the cold, but what we all forget is that we are the youngest team in the NFL. There is so much upside. Young players now have playoff experience. Mr Mcarthy now knows what pressure is really like, and fans like myself can turn our attention to next year where the team is one year older and wiser. Whether Brett returns or not, the 2007 Packers have laid the foundations for an even more excitable 2008. Mr Rodgers will fit into the system because of a great young receiving core.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After watching the game and being completely shattered!!! I have spent the last few hours pondering the season that we had. Yes we lost in the the worst way, at home and in the cold, but what we all forget is that we are the youngest team in the NFL. There is so much upside. Young players now have playoff experience. Mr Mcarthy now knows what pressure is really like, and fans like myself can turn our attention to next year where the team is one year older and wiser. Whether Brett returns or not, the 2007 Packers have laid the foundations for an even more excitable 2008. Mr Rodgers will fit into the system because of a great young receiving core.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaxhawk</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/01/21/some-perspective-on-favre-please/#comment-462</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jaxhawk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 22:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2008/01/21/some-perspective-on-favre-please/#comment-462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He can play until he is 40 and will still be a draw, and an contributor/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He can play until he is 40 and will still be a draw, and an contributor/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
