<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Play of the Game</title>
	<atom:link href="http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2007/11/30/play-of-the-game/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2007/11/30/play-of-the-game/</link>
	<description>All Things Green Bay Packers</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 03:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Play of the Game, Continued &#171; packergeeks</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2007/11/30/play-of-the-game/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Play of the Game, Continued &#171; packergeeks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 14:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2007/11/30/play-of-the-game/#comment-95</guid>
		<description>[...] of the Game,&#160;Continued  Yesterday, we offered our view of the most important play from Thursday&#8217;s game.  But for me, the clear play of the game was the Packers’ failure to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the Game,&nbsp;Continued  Yesterday, we offered our view of the most important play from Thursday&#8217;s game.  But for me, the clear play of the game was the Packers’ failure to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andyadontstop</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2007/11/30/play-of-the-game/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>andyadontstop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2007/11/30/play-of-the-game/#comment-83</guid>
		<description>the pass interference was not questionable...the defender never looked back, therefore he did not make a play on the ball.  this is why it was not considered incidental contact.

but, you're right about the botched challenge...your team got robbed.  al harris took that ball right from TO's hands inbounds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the pass interference was not questionable&#8230;the defender never looked back, therefore he did not make a play on the ball.  this is why it was not considered incidental contact.</p>
<p>but, you&#8217;re right about the botched challenge&#8230;your team got robbed.  al harris took that ball right from TO&#8217;s hands inbounds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ace</title>
		<link>http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2007/11/30/play-of-the-game/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Ace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packergeeks.wordpress.com/2007/11/30/play-of-the-game/#comment-79</guid>
		<description>Agree-3rd and 19 was the play of the game.  Each injured Packer was significant, including those that played hurt like Tauscher, Collins and Tramon Williams.  We needed KGB.  Romo had all kinds of time.  Next time may well be different.  In the playoffs, Packers by 7 at Dallas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree-3rd and 19 was the play of the game.  Each injured Packer was significant, including those that played hurt like Tauscher, Collins and Tramon Williams.  We needed KGB.  Romo had all kinds of time.  Next time may well be different.  In the playoffs, Packers by 7 at Dallas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
